04.01.2013 Views

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

100 HERACLITUS<br />

this last text would be <strong>to</strong> suppose that Heraclitus is scornful of ‘philosophical<br />

men’; <strong>the</strong> term ‘philosopher’, if genuinely Heraclitus’ own, makes its first known<br />

appearance here. Such people, he might be saying, must, if <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>to</strong> attain that<br />

status, engage in <strong>the</strong> kind of research that brings learning but no understanding.<br />

But that is not <strong>the</strong> kind of thinker that Heraclitus himself respects.<br />

It might be thought that Heraclitus respects only his own judgement: ‘I<br />

searched myself (B101); 96 ‘Of those whose <strong>the</strong>ories I have heard, none has<br />

attained this: <strong>to</strong> recognize that <strong>the</strong> wise is distinct from all things’ (B108). 97 Only<br />

one thinker is mentioned with respect, and that is Bias, one of <strong>the</strong> seven sages,<br />

but since little is known of him nothing can be deduced as <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> grounds on<br />

which Heraclitus observes that ‘his logos is greater than <strong>the</strong> rest’. 98<br />

What can safely be deduced? Heraclitus does not hold that research of <strong>the</strong><br />

normal sort practised by philosophers and poets offers a way <strong>to</strong> an understanding<br />

of <strong>the</strong> significant truth. There is one truth that all but a few fail <strong>to</strong> appreciate, and<br />

that is <strong>the</strong> independence of <strong>the</strong> one thing that is wise: its detachment from <strong>the</strong><br />

great plurality of things in<strong>to</strong> which <strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r thinkers enquire and <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge of which <strong>the</strong>y amass with such enthusiasm.<br />

One thing, what is wise, <strong>to</strong> understand <strong>the</strong> sense in <strong>the</strong> way in which it<br />

controls all things through all things.<br />

(B41) 99<br />

POLITICS, VIRTUE AND GLORY<br />

Diodotus…says that <strong>the</strong> treatise is not about nature but about politics<br />

and what it says concerning nature is included as illustrative<br />

examples.<br />

(Diogenes Laertius Lives IX. 15)<br />

Even if we do not subscribe <strong>to</strong> Diodotus’ extreme view, it is evident that<br />

Heraclitus expressed some opinions on political matters. Predictably something<br />

goes wrong with politics if <strong>the</strong> choice of leader lies with those who are out of<br />

<strong>to</strong>uch with what matters; Heraclitus explodes about <strong>the</strong> action of his own citizens<br />

in expelling <strong>the</strong> one man who was worth having:<br />

It would be worthwhile if <strong>the</strong> Ephesians were all hanged from <strong>the</strong> young men<br />

upwards, and left <strong>the</strong> city <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> boys, since <strong>the</strong>y expelled Hermodorus who<br />

was <strong>the</strong> most valuable man of <strong>the</strong>m all, saying: Let not one among us be<br />

<strong>the</strong> most valuable; or else let him be elsewhere and among o<strong>the</strong>r people.<br />

(B121) 100<br />

What does Heraclitus mean by <strong>the</strong> ‘most valuable’? The point seems <strong>to</strong> be that<br />

<strong>the</strong> citizens have rejected <strong>the</strong> person who was most effective at <strong>the</strong> job, purely out

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!