04.01.2013 Views

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FROM THE BEGINNING TO PLATO 355<br />

5 Symposium 207d–208b: <strong>the</strong> relation between <strong>the</strong> different phases of ‘one‘ life is <strong>the</strong><br />

same as that between a parent and its offspring. See also Cratylus 439d; Theaetetus<br />

154a, 159d–160a; Timaeus 49c–e. Contrast Phaedo 102e.<br />

6 Even in this most extreme statement of <strong>the</strong> doctrine of flux, Pla<strong>to</strong> allows that <strong>the</strong><br />

later and earlier objects share many characteristics. Hence, he does not accept <strong>the</strong><br />

Theaetetus’ wild version of Heracliteanism which says that sensibles always<br />

change in every respect.<br />

7 Timaeus 49d–e. For o<strong>the</strong>r views on flux, see Bol<strong>to</strong>n [10.65], Irwin [10.80].<br />

8 For a different interpretation, see Fine, ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII’,<br />

in [10.101], 85–115.<br />

9 This <strong>to</strong>pic is thoroughly examined in Malcolm [10.85].<br />

10 Hippias Major 289d, 291d, 292c–d, 297e, 304d; Charmides 161a–b; Laches 192c–<br />

d.<br />

11 Hippias Major 292e; Protagoras 330c–e.<br />

12 Hippias Major 291c.<br />

13 Hippias Major 291d.<br />

14 Hippias Major 296c–d.<br />

15 Lysis 217c; Charmides 160e–161a, 169d–e; Hippias Major 291c; Gorgias 497e;<br />

Meno 87d–e; Phaedo 68d–e, 100e–101b; Republic 335d–e, 379a–c; Parmenides<br />

131c–d; Philebus 65a.<br />

16 Hippias Major 287c.<br />

17 While Pla<strong>to</strong> allows that physical conditions and phenomena are necessary<br />

conditions for <strong>the</strong> items he explains in o<strong>the</strong>r terms, <strong>the</strong> Phaedo (99a–b) denies <strong>the</strong>m<br />

<strong>the</strong> title of ‘explanations’. In <strong>the</strong> Timaeus (46c–d), however, he calls <strong>the</strong>m<br />

secondary or co-operative causes or explanations.<br />

18 Parmenides 139e, 148a.<br />

19 See, for example, Symposium 211e, Republic 500c, Phaedo 84b, Pbaedrus 250a,<br />

Sophist 254b, Philebus 62a.<br />

20 See Vlas<strong>to</strong>s [10.98], 58–75. For <strong>the</strong> ideas in <strong>the</strong> paragraph before last, see [10.98],<br />

43–57.<br />

21 Timaeus 38b.<br />

22 Republic 478b12–c1 with 478d–479d.<br />

23 Phaedo 74c1–2. Pla<strong>to</strong> equates two questions: (1) Is Equality ever unequal? (2) Is<br />

Equality ever Inequality?<br />

Had he seen <strong>the</strong> difference, he should also have seen (2)’s irrelevance <strong>to</strong> his<br />

argument. He is trying <strong>to</strong> show that sensible equals differ from Equality because<br />

<strong>the</strong>y possess a feature Equality lacks. But sensible equals no more appear <strong>to</strong> be<br />

Inequality than Equality does.<br />

24 On this point see Frede [10.74], 51–2.<br />

25 Timaeus 52a, c; Symposium 211a–b.<br />

26 Phaedo 102d–e, 103b; Republic 501b; Parmenides 132d.<br />

27 Theaetetus 177a.<br />

28 Republic 532c–d.<br />

29 Phaedo 80d.<br />

30 Republic 5080, 509d, 517b.<br />

31 Republic 526e.<br />

32 Theaetetus 177a.<br />

33 Republic 592b.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!