04.01.2013 Views

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMPEDOCLES 171<br />

disintegration of <strong>the</strong> divine harmony. In <strong>the</strong> resulting movements, as <strong>the</strong><br />

elements ‘run through each o<strong>the</strong>r’, <strong>the</strong> present world order would be generated,<br />

with its teeming variety of plant, animal and human life. During this time Love<br />

should be envisaged initially as <strong>the</strong> more powerful force, and, on <strong>the</strong> analogy of a<br />

craftsman, as engendering well-constructed forms of life in sympathy with each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r. But Strife, with increasing power and ferocity, is preparing <strong>to</strong> tear <strong>the</strong>m<br />

apart, and eventually <strong>to</strong> bring down <strong>the</strong> cosmic edifice in <strong>the</strong> return once more <strong>to</strong><br />

akosmia. The limits of <strong>the</strong> powers of both attraction and separation are presumed<br />

<strong>to</strong> be held, like <strong>the</strong> elements which <strong>the</strong>y control, within <strong>the</strong> circumference of <strong>the</strong><br />

sphere, <strong>the</strong> kuklos, that persists throughout; beyond <strong>the</strong>se lies what is described<br />

in <strong>the</strong> doxography without fur<strong>the</strong>r explanation as ‘idle matter’ (argē httlē is <strong>the</strong><br />

term at Aetius I.5.2).<br />

Some of <strong>the</strong> details of <strong>the</strong> process are controversial, and even <strong>the</strong> basic idea of<br />

cosmic phases being repeated has been challenged, and, given <strong>the</strong> fragmentary<br />

nature of <strong>the</strong> primary sources, <strong>the</strong>re can be no certainty. But <strong>the</strong> consensus of<br />

opinion, supported by such testimony as we do have from <strong>the</strong> primary and<br />

secondary sources, suggests a reconstruction along <strong>the</strong> following lines, with<br />

Empedocles’ poetic skill giving a vivid character <strong>to</strong> his descriptions of elements<br />

reacting <strong>to</strong> contrary forces. At one time <strong>the</strong> four (‘fire and water and earth and<br />

measureless height of air’) were completely separate under Strife, and Love lay<br />

inactive at <strong>the</strong> circumference; <strong>the</strong>n came <strong>the</strong> increase of her power, initiated (in<br />

<strong>the</strong> metaphor of <strong>the</strong> invasion of foreign terri<strong>to</strong>ry) by a move <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> centre, and <strong>the</strong><br />

consolidation of her position as Strife was pushed back. This alternation was<br />

manifest in <strong>the</strong> elements consequently ‘running through’ each o<strong>the</strong>r, and so<br />

causing <strong>the</strong> rise of a generation of mortal beings. Some monsters and strange<br />

shapes emerged at first, even separate limbs and ‘heads without necks’, but <strong>the</strong>se<br />

were short-lived, whereas those that were well formed and fitted for survival<br />

became a viable generation of living creatures. Love was eventual vic<strong>to</strong>r in <strong>the</strong><br />

cosmic battle, bringing all <strong>the</strong> elements in<strong>to</strong> one, and so generating <strong>the</strong> blessed<br />

god (<strong>the</strong>os eudaimonesta<strong>to</strong>s), in which Strife had no part. But <strong>the</strong> ideal state<br />

came <strong>to</strong> an end, and, when <strong>the</strong> time was completed, Strife struck as Love had<br />

done by rushing <strong>to</strong> claim <strong>the</strong> centre. This caused a mighty disturbance as ‘one by<br />

one all <strong>the</strong> parts of <strong>the</strong> god began <strong>to</strong> tremble’ (fr. 31).<br />

Empedocles saw <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> present world as a consequence of this<br />

upheaval. In <strong>the</strong> succeeding phase of his cosmogony, as Strife began <strong>the</strong> process<br />

of separation, he introduced <strong>the</strong> important concept of a rotation (a vortex or dinē)<br />

starting in <strong>the</strong> centre, which was <strong>the</strong> immediate cause of <strong>the</strong> separating of <strong>the</strong><br />

closely mingled parts of <strong>the</strong> different elements. First it seems that air was drawn<br />

out and flowed round in a circle, followed by fire, which solidified some of <strong>the</strong><br />

air in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> ouranos as aithēr and brought down <strong>the</strong> heavier particles as<br />

atmospheric mist. The force of <strong>the</strong> rotation also compressed parts of <strong>the</strong> earth<br />

in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> centre, and water consequently exuded from it <strong>to</strong> form <strong>the</strong> sea (‘sea is <strong>the</strong><br />

sweat of earth’ as Empedocles expressed it in a typical homology, fr. 55). Such<br />

fire as was still in <strong>the</strong> earth warmed some of <strong>the</strong> remaining water <strong>to</strong> produce hot

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!