04.01.2013 Views

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

256 FROM THE BEGINNING TO PLATO<br />

general. For rationals and irrationals he formulated definitions and<br />

differentiae, determined also many orders of <strong>the</strong> irrationals, and brought <strong>to</strong><br />

light whatever of definiteness is <strong>to</strong> be found in <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

([8.60], I.1)<br />

Later Pappus writes:<br />

Those who have written concerning <strong>the</strong>se things declare that <strong>the</strong> A<strong>the</strong>nian<br />

Theaetetus assumed two lines commensurable in square [only] and proved<br />

that if he <strong>to</strong>ok between <strong>the</strong>m a line in ratio according <strong>to</strong> geometric<br />

proportion, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> line named <strong>the</strong> medial was produced, but that if he<br />

<strong>to</strong>ok <strong>the</strong> line according <strong>to</strong> arithmetic proportion, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> binomial was<br />

produced, and if he <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>the</strong> line according <strong>to</strong> harmonic proportion, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>the</strong> apo<strong>to</strong>me was produced.<br />

([8.60], II.17)<br />

These assertions require some explication. I begin with <strong>the</strong> notions of geometric,<br />

arithmetic and harmonic proportion, and with a fragment of Archytas’ On Music.<br />

There are three musical means, <strong>the</strong> first arithmetic, <strong>the</strong> second geometric,<br />

<strong>the</strong> third subcontrary (hupenantios), which is also called harmonic. There<br />

is an arithmetic mean when <strong>the</strong>re are three terms in proportion with respect<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> same excess: <strong>the</strong> second term exceeds <strong>the</strong> third term by as much as<br />

<strong>the</strong> first does <strong>the</strong> second…. There is a geometric mean when <strong>the</strong> second<br />

term is <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> third as <strong>the</strong> first is <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> second… There is a<br />

subcontrary mean (which we call harmonic) when <strong>the</strong> first term exceeds<br />

<strong>the</strong> second by <strong>the</strong> same part of <strong>the</strong> first as <strong>the</strong> middle exceeds <strong>the</strong> third by a<br />

part of <strong>the</strong> third.<br />

(Porphyry [8.73], 93.6–15, DK 47 B 2)<br />

Here Archytas speaks of three types of means ra<strong>the</strong>r than three types of<br />

proportions, although <strong>the</strong> vocabulary of proportions also slips in<strong>to</strong> what he says.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> present context I shall speak of <strong>the</strong> three types of mean and use <strong>the</strong> word<br />

‘proportion’ only for expressions of <strong>the</strong> form ‘x:y :: z:w’. The geometric mean<br />

is, of course, <strong>the</strong> middle of three terms standing in a standard proportion. The<br />

arithmetic mean is simply <strong>the</strong> arithmetic average of two terms x and z, that is<br />

. The harmonic mean is usually given a more general definition which<br />

we find in Nicomachus ([8.55], II.25.1; cf. Theon of Smyrna [8.92], 114.14–17),<br />

according <strong>to</strong> which:<br />

y is <strong>the</strong> harmonic mean between x and z if and only if

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!