26.01.2013 Views

Presuppositions in Spoken Discourse

Presuppositions in Spoken Discourse

Presuppositions in Spoken Discourse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Del<strong>in</strong>, J. (1995), ‘Presupposition and shared knowledge <strong>in</strong> it-clefts’, Language and Cognitive Processes,<br />

10: 97–120<br />

Eckert, M. and M. Strube (2000), ‘Dialogue Acts, Synchronis<strong>in</strong>g Units and Anaphora’, Journal of<br />

Semantics 17, 1: 51–89.<br />

Erku F. & Gundel J. K. (1987) ‘The pragmatics of <strong>in</strong>direct anaphors’, <strong>in</strong> J. Verschueren & M.<br />

Bertuccelli-Papi, (eds.), The pragmatic perspective: selected papers from the 1985<br />

International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Fjelkestam-Nilsson, B. (1983), Also and Too, A Corpus-Based Study of Their Frequency and Use <strong>in</strong><br />

Modern English, Stockholm Studies <strong>in</strong> English, Almqvist & Wiksell International,<br />

Stockholm, Sweden.<br />

Fraassen B. van.(1969), ‘<strong>Presuppositions</strong>, super-valuations, and free logic’, <strong>in</strong> K. Lambert(ed,),<br />

The Logical Way of Do<strong>in</strong>g Th<strong>in</strong>gs, Yale University Press, New Haven, 67–91.<br />

Fraurud, K. (1990), ‘Def<strong>in</strong>iteness and the process<strong>in</strong>g of NP‘s <strong>in</strong> natural discourse’, Journal of<br />

Semantics, 7, 395–433.<br />

Fraurud, K. (1992), Situation Reference (What does ‘it‘ refer to?), GAP Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper No. 24,<br />

Hamburg: Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg.<br />

Frege, G., (1892), ‘Über S<strong>in</strong>n und Bedeutung’, <strong>in</strong> Zeitscrhift für Philosophie unbd philosophisched Kritik,<br />

100, 25–50. English translation from Translations from the Philosophical Writ<strong>in</strong>gs of Gottlob Frege,<br />

ed. P. Geach & M. Black, Oxford, Blackwell, 1952, pp. 56–78.<br />

Fox, B. (1987), <strong>Discourse</strong> Structure and Anaphora: written and conversational English. Cambridge<br />

University Press.<br />

Gazdar, G. (1979), Pragmatics, Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. Academic Press. New<br />

York.<br />

Geurts, B. (1999), <strong>Presuppositions</strong> and Pronouns, Current Research <strong>in</strong> the Semantics/Pragmatics<br />

Interface: Vol 3., Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, London.<br />

Geurts, B. (2001), ‘Buoyancy and Strength’, Journal of Semantics, 17, 4: 315–334.<br />

Groenendijk J. & M. Stokhof (1991), ‘Dynamic predicate logic’, L<strong>in</strong>guistics and Philosophy 14: 39–<br />

100.<br />

Grosz, B. & Sidner, C. (1986), ‘Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of <strong>Discourse</strong>.’<br />

Computational L<strong>in</strong>guistics,12, 3: 175–204.<br />

Gundel, J. Hedberg, N & Zacharski R. (1993), ‘Cognitive Status and the Form of Referr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Expressions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Discourse</strong>’, Language 69: 274–307.<br />

Haviland, S. & H. Clark (1974), ‘What’s new? Acquir<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong>formation as a process <strong>in</strong><br />

comprehension’, Journal of Verbal Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Verbal Behavior, 13: 512–521.<br />

Hawk<strong>in</strong>s, J. A. (1978), Def<strong>in</strong>iteness and <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>iteness, Croom Helm Ltd, London.<br />

Heim, I. (1982), The Semantics of Def<strong>in</strong>ite and Indef<strong>in</strong>ite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of<br />

Massachusetts, Amherst.<br />

Heim, I. (1983), ‘On the Projection Problem for <strong>Presuppositions</strong>’, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Second West<br />

Coast Conference on Formal L<strong>in</strong>guistics, 2: 144–26. Repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> S. Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics,<br />

Oxford university Press, Oxford, 397–405.<br />

Hobbs, J. (1979), ‘Coherence and coreference’, Cognitive Science, 3: 67–90<br />

Horn, L. (1984), ‘Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic <strong>in</strong>ference: Q–based and R–based<br />

implicature’, <strong>in</strong> D. Schiffr<strong>in</strong> (ed.), Mean<strong>in</strong>g, form, and use <strong>in</strong> context: l<strong>in</strong>guistic applications (GURT<br />

’84), Georgetown University Press, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, 11–42.<br />

Jacobson, S. (1964), ’Adverbial Positions <strong>in</strong> English’, Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala<br />

Kamp, H. (2001) ‘Computation and Justification of <strong>Presuppositions</strong>,’ <strong>in</strong> Bras, M. & L. Vieu<br />

(eds.) Semantics and Pragmatics of <strong>Discourse</strong> and Dialogue: Experiment<strong>in</strong>g with Current Theories,<br />

Elsevier, 2001.<br />

Kamp, H. & U. Reyle (1993), From <strong>Discourse</strong> to Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.<br />

Kamp H. & A. Rossdeutscher (1994), DRS Construction and Lexically Driven Inference.<br />

Theoretical L<strong>in</strong>guistics 20, pp. 97–164.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!