18.02.2013 Views

Program including abstracts as pdf available here

Program including abstracts as pdf available here

Program including abstracts as pdf available here

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OP 27<br />

Title<br />

DOSE REDuCTION IN DIGITAL CEPHALOMETRIC RADIOGRAPHy<br />

Authors<br />

R. HOOGEVEEN 1 , R.H. OWSIEJCO 1 , D.V. DANG 1 , G.C.H. SANDERINK 1<br />

Affiliations<br />

1 ACTA - Department of Oral Radiology, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

Body<br />

Objectives:<br />

To identify the effect of reduced mAs settings on the accuracy of cephalometric analysis.<br />

Materials and methods:<br />

A human skull embedded in soft tissue equivalent materials w<strong>as</strong> exposed in a Instrumentarium<br />

OC100D machine. Exposure settings were 100, 80, 50, 30 and 20% of the settings <strong>as</strong> recommended<br />

by the manufacturer. The cephalometric analysis w<strong>as</strong> performed by 9 residents of the<br />

department of Orthodontics using the Viewbox cephalometric software. The accuracy of 15<br />

common landmarks w<strong>as</strong> investigated and statistical analysis w<strong>as</strong> performed with SPSS using<br />

the multivariate F-test.<br />

Results:<br />

No significant differences were found between any of the exposure settings.<br />

Conclusions and discussion:<br />

Considerable dose reduction seems possible in the situation <strong>as</strong> described. Although the image<br />

quality subjectively seems to reduce, this did not affect the outcomes of the cephalometric<br />

analysis. These results urge to investigate also other machines and phosphor plate systems <strong>as</strong><br />

apparently a tremendous dose reduction can be achieved.<br />

Keywords<br />

Cephalometry, Radiography, Dental, Digital<br />

aBSTracTS OP 2<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!