10.04.2013 Views

Peak Oil Task Force Report - City of Bloomington - State of Indiana

Peak Oil Task Force Report - City of Bloomington - State of Indiana

Peak Oil Task Force Report - City of Bloomington - State of Indiana

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Given the enormous rate at which the world has been burning its way through oil in the<br />

past few decades, two things are highly probable:<br />

• Geological constraints alone are enough to prevent continued production at the<br />

current near‐peak rates much beyond 2015.<br />

• Despite continuing significant declines as time goes on, production rates will remain<br />

sufficiently high that most <strong>of</strong> the remaining oil in the world will be consumed over<br />

the course <strong>of</strong> the next few decades. If the downslope <strong>of</strong> the global oil production<br />

curve resembles the upslope, 90% <strong>of</strong> the world’s remaining recoverable oil will be<br />

gone within 50 years <strong>of</strong> the peak – in other words, within roughly 50 years <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present.<br />

What’s more, the U.S. currently imports approximately two‐thirds <strong>of</strong> its oil. Our ability to<br />

do so depends on the continued willingness and ability <strong>of</strong> a relatively small number <strong>of</strong> oil‐<br />

producing nations with surpluses to continue to export. However, production within many<br />

<strong>of</strong> those countries will probably be going into decline within one or two decades.<br />

It’s time to change the way we do business. It’s time to re‐think our individual and<br />

community habits to radically reduce our reliance on oil.<br />

STRATEGIES THAT WILL NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM<br />

As the discourse on “peak oil” intensifies, so too do possible “solutions.” Many solutions<br />

pivot on the idea that we will be able to continue “business as usual” without any effort to<br />

conserve or become more efficient. For reasons explained below, the <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong> considers<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the most popular proposals – drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, mining<br />

oil shale and bi<strong>of</strong>uels – as intrinsically limited and flawed.<br />

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)<br />

The ban on <strong>of</strong>fshore drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) has re‐entered<br />

public discussion and some advocate for opening up this ecologically‐fragile area for<br />

drilling. However, even if a substantial amount <strong>of</strong> oil is found in this area, it will take many<br />

years to bring it into production.<br />

<strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bloomington</strong> <strong>Peak</strong> <strong>Oil</strong> <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong><br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!