parents and principals as partners in creating a culture of learning
parents and principals as partners in creating a culture of learning
parents and principals as partners in creating a culture of learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
[106]<br />
(ed.), 1993:77) have shown that the me<strong>as</strong>ur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>strument h<strong>as</strong> the greatest<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence on the reliability <strong>of</strong> research data. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> me<strong>as</strong>urement<br />
are best controlled by the careful construction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>strument. There is,<br />
however, <strong>in</strong>sufficient appreciation for the fact that a questionnaire should be<br />
constructed accord<strong>in</strong>g to certa<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (Kidder & Judd, 1986:128-131; Behr,<br />
1988:155-156).<br />
A well-designed questionnaire is the culm<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong>a long process <strong>of</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
research objective, formulat<strong>in</strong>g the problem, generat<strong>in</strong>g the hypothesis, etc. A<br />
questionnaire is not simply thrown together. A poorly-designed questionnaire can<br />
<strong>in</strong>validate any research results, notwithst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g the merits <strong>of</strong> the sample, the field<br />
workers <strong>and</strong> the statistical techniques (Huysamen, 1989:2). In their criticism <strong>of</strong><br />
questionnaires Berchie & Anderson (Schnetler (ed.), (1993:61) object to poor<br />
design rather than to questionnaires <strong>as</strong> such. A well-designed questionnaire can<br />
boost the reliability <strong>and</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> the data to acceptable tolerance (Schumacher<br />
& McMiIlan, 1993:42).<br />
It therefore st<strong>and</strong>s to re<strong>as</strong>on that questionnaire design does not take place <strong>in</strong> a<br />
vacuum. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Dane (1990:315-319) the length <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual questions,<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> response options, <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the format <strong>and</strong> word<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> questions<br />
are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Choice <strong>of</strong> the subject to be researched.<br />
Aim <strong>of</strong> the research.<br />
Size <strong>of</strong> the research sample.<br />
Method <strong>of</strong> data collection.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the data.<br />
Aga<strong>in</strong>st this background the researcher can now look at the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples that<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e whether a questionnaire is well-designed. It is thus necessary to draw