05.05.2013 Views

parents and principals as partners in creating a culture of learning

parents and principals as partners in creating a culture of learning

parents and principals as partners in creating a culture of learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[ 39 1<br />

the child trusts <strong>and</strong> accepts the adult <strong>as</strong> a guide to <strong>and</strong> an image <strong>of</strong> his own future.<br />

This result<strong>in</strong>g sense <strong>of</strong> confidence <strong>and</strong> security promotes the child's read<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong><br />

will<strong>in</strong>gness to explore <strong>and</strong> to learn (Du Toit & Kruger, 1994:11).<br />

From the above, it is evident that the relationship <strong>of</strong> trust is significantly<br />

pathic/affective <strong>in</strong> nature. It is primarily with<strong>in</strong> this relationship that the trusted<br />

adult accompanies the trust<strong>in</strong>g child <strong>and</strong> provides emotional support. The qual ity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the relationship <strong>of</strong> trust, or affective guidance, is directly related to the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> the child's learn<strong>in</strong>g (Sonnekus, 1985:51; Vrey, 1990:24).<br />

Whatever the educator <strong>and</strong> the educ<strong>and</strong> accomplish dur<strong>in</strong>g their pedagogic<br />

encounter, there is a specific goal, namely that the events are aimed towards a<br />

future about which the educ<strong>and</strong> is still uncerta<strong>in</strong>. He searches for certa<strong>in</strong>ty. His<br />

human form <strong>of</strong> existence is a ventur<strong>in</strong>g out to the future. Because this is<br />

<strong>in</strong>evitable, he h<strong>as</strong> to depend on the support <strong>of</strong> the adult to do so. S<strong>in</strong>ce his future<br />

actually represents a grater existential ventur<strong>in</strong>g than <strong>in</strong> the present, he needs<br />

someone he can trust, <strong>in</strong> this way he will ga<strong>in</strong> a foothold or 'anchorage' <strong>in</strong> life,<br />

today, tomorrow <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the days to follow. He wants to be certa<strong>in</strong> that life (with<br />

his educator) is mean<strong>in</strong>gful, <strong>and</strong> that his participation <strong>in</strong> life <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> reality is not<br />

without significance. He hankers after safety <strong>and</strong> security <strong>and</strong> once he h<strong>as</strong><br />

acquired this, he experiences emotional security (Du Plooy, Griessel &<br />

Oberholzer, 1992:95).<br />

A trust<strong>in</strong>g sphere <strong>in</strong> which the child <strong>and</strong> the educator (parent) accept each other<br />

<strong>as</strong> persons who are bearers <strong>of</strong> human dignity is necessary to constitute the<br />

education relationship. In accept<strong>in</strong>g the child, the adult must accept the child <strong>as</strong><br />

he is, but also <strong>as</strong> he wants to be, must be <strong>and</strong> should be. The mutual <strong>in</strong>volvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the educator <strong>and</strong> the child is <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> the adult's accost<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the child <strong>as</strong> a<br />

"child". In call<strong>in</strong>g out the name "child" the adult concurs that he accepts the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> an ontic bond between himself <strong>and</strong> the child. This ontic bond is a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!