29.05.2013 Views

here - First Legume Society Conference (LSC1)

here - First Legume Society Conference (LSC1)

here - First Legume Society Conference (LSC1)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Book of Abstracts <strong>First</strong> <strong>Legume</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> 2013: A <strong>Legume</strong> Odyssey Novi Sad, Serbia, 9-11 May 2013<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Use of molecular markers for detection of ascochyta blight and fusarium wilt resistance<br />

in Tunisian chickpea breeding lines<br />

Mariem Bouhadida 1 , Rim Ben Jannet 1 , Warda Jendoubi 1 , Moez Amri 2 , Mohamed Kharrat 1,3<br />

1<br />

University of Carthage, Field Crop Laboratory, National Institute for Agricultural Research of Tunisia,<br />

Tunisia<br />

2<br />

Field Crop Laboratory, Regional Field Crop Research Center of Béja, Béja, Tunisia<br />

3<br />

Intenational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Rabat-Instituts, Rabat, Morocco<br />

Twenty three chickpea cultivars, mainly advanced lines and some Tunisian varieties released by<br />

the national chickpea breeding program, have been studied for their resistance to the two most<br />

damaging diseases: ascochyta blight (AB) and fusarium wilt (FW). The field evaluation for AB<br />

was conducted in two field locations and under controlled conditions. Two co-dominant markers<br />

associated with AB resistance were also used in this study; the CaETR marker tightly linked to<br />

QTL AR1 in combination with the SCAR SCY17 590 marker linked to another QTL AR2. These two<br />

markers contribute efficiently in the selection of new chickpea varieties with the better<br />

combination of alleles to ensure a durable resistance for AB and are very useful in the chickpea<br />

breeding program. The same genotypes were also subject to FW field evaluation during two<br />

cropping season and under controlled conditions. Four STMS markers associated with FW<br />

resistance were also used, three of them (TA27, TA59 and TA96) were found tightly linked to the<br />

second gene controlling the resistance to race 0 of FW. While the fourth STMS used in this study<br />

(TR59) was closely linked to the first gene of resistance. The dendrogram obtained from the<br />

molecular profiles with these 4 STMS markers does not classify the studied genotypes according<br />

to their behavior toward FW. In fact, these markers are described to have extensive<br />

polymorphism. Thus, resistance allele prediction with STMS is difficult. The development of new<br />

stable marker as diagnostic or SCAR markers is on-going for genotyping correctly susceptible and<br />

resistant chickpea lines to FW which could be very interesting in assisting chickpea breeding<br />

program.<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!