23.09.2013 Views

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AQUINAS AND INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE 11<br />

others as you would want they should do unto. you, seems to be<br />

epitomized in the word 'dialogue'. It is therefore not surprising that<br />

this word is frequently used in ecclesiastical and theological parlance.<br />

It refers to communication within a Church (intra-denominational),<br />

communication between Churches (in<strong>te</strong>r-denominational or intrareligious)<br />

and communication between religions (in<strong>te</strong>r-religious)",<br />

When a word is thus frequently used, and in so many different<br />

con<strong>te</strong>xts, it gets a certain vagueness. In some instances, dialogue<br />

seems to cover any kind of communication. In other usages, however,<br />

dialogue is sharply contras<strong>te</strong>d to other forms of in<strong>te</strong>rreligious<br />

communication, such as polemics or mission. Some theologians<br />

advoca<strong>te</strong> the necessity of dialogue as a new method of communicating<br />

the Christian Gospel to others: dialogue is the modem form of<br />

mission. Ins<strong>te</strong>ad of the one-way traffic of evangelization, in<strong>te</strong>rreligious<br />

dialogue means openness, mutuality, and the willingness to learn from<br />

each other". But in some of the most recent theological documents<br />

from the doctrinal authorities of the Roman Catholic Church, dialogue<br />

seems to be a flag covering the cargo of old-fashioned mission as<br />

evangelization? One has to conclude that there is a delibera<strong>te</strong><br />

ambiguity in the use of the word 'dialogue' in the Catholic Church.<br />

On the one hand, this word signals a change of attitude from the lofty<br />

possession of ultima<strong>te</strong> Truth to a position of equality and an awareness<br />

that all human beings are together in pursuit of an ever grea<strong>te</strong>r Truth.<br />

But, on the other hand, the claim to possess the only way to<br />

salvation through the person of Jesus Christ is still made by most of<br />

For an analysis of some examples, see P. Valkenberg, "The Myth of<br />

a Dialogue between Equals: Who needs In<strong>te</strong>rreligious Dialogue in Wes<strong>te</strong>rn<br />

Europe?", W. Valkenberg / F. Wijsen (eds.), The Polemical Dialogue:<br />

Research into Dialogue, Truth, and Truthfulness (Nijmegen Studies in<br />

Development and Cultural Change, 24), Saarbrücken <strong>1997</strong>, 85-104.<br />

6 See, for instance, P.F. Knit<strong>te</strong>r, Jesus and the Other Names:<br />

Christian Mission and Global Responsibility, Maryknoll NY 1996, chap<strong>te</strong>r 7:<br />

"Mission Reaffirmed - Mission as Dialogue", pp. 136-164.<br />

? This is the case in the encyclical Redemptoris Missio. See also two<br />

recent documents of the In<strong>te</strong>rnational Theological Commission, on God as<br />

Saviour (1994) and on Christianity and the Religions (1996).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!