23.09.2013 Views

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 PIM VALKENBERG<br />

thoughts in the Middle Ages retain their fruitfulness".<br />

Another reason why the Middle Ages are fairly of<strong>te</strong>n<br />

mentioned in connection with in<strong>te</strong>rreligious dialogue, is that some of<br />

the Jews, Christians and Muslims in those days could understand each<br />

other qui<strong>te</strong> well, because they wrestled with the same in<strong>te</strong>llectual<br />

problems. If communication between peoples of different cultural and<br />

religious backgrounds is to succeed, they will have to find a certain<br />

common language by means of which they are able to understand each<br />

other IS. It has been argued that the language of philosophy was able to<br />

media<strong>te</strong> communication between Jews, Christians and Muslims in the<br />

Middle Ages. But in a certain sense, philosophy was part of their<br />

problem as well. One may charac<strong>te</strong>rize this common problem as the<br />

relation between faith and reason, between the authoritative world<br />

view in the sacred books of God's revelation, and the well-considered<br />

world view of the philosophical <strong>te</strong>xts that could do without such a<br />

special revelation. Of course, this was (according to many<br />

in<strong>te</strong>rpre<strong>te</strong>rs) the problem de<strong>te</strong>rmining the construction of Aquinas'<br />

Summa contra Gentiles", In this sense, Aquinas is a predecessor of<br />

modern awareness of pluralism and secularism. But the same problem,<br />

or rather a parallel problem, domina<strong>te</strong>s much of the history of Jewish<br />

14 See, among others, R. Arnaldez, A la croisee des trois<br />

monothéismes: une communauté de pensée au Moyen Age, Paris 1993, p.8; R.<br />

Schaeffler in A. Bs<strong>te</strong>h (Hrsg.), Christlicher Glaube in der Begegnung mit dem<br />

Islam (Studien zur Religionstheologie, 2), Mödling 1996, p. 325; W. Raven,<br />

"Ontstaan en verbreiding", H. Driessen (red.), In het huis van de islam,<br />

Nijmegen <strong>1997</strong>, pp. 54-56. R. Leuze (Chris<strong>te</strong>ntum und Islam, Tübingen 1994,<br />

p.5) defends the contrary position: "Das Verständnis des Islam im christlichen<br />

Mit<strong>te</strong>lal<strong>te</strong>r kann keine Basis sein für unsere Auseinandersetzung mit dieser<br />

Religion".<br />

IS P. Lapide und R. Panikkar, Meinen wir denselben Gott? Ein<br />

Streitgespräch, München 1994, p. 104.<br />

16 H. Hoping, Weisheit als Wissen des Ursprungs: Philosophie und<br />

Theologie in der > > Summa contra gentiles < < des <strong>Thomas</strong> von Aquin,<br />

Freiburg - Basel - Wien <strong>1997</strong>, p.lü.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!