Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht
Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht
Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AQUINAS AND INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE 25<br />
that Islamic kalàm bears a great resemblance to. Christian sys<strong>te</strong>matic<br />
theology, so that 'kaläm' is of<strong>te</strong>n transla<strong>te</strong>d as 'speculative theology'<br />
or 'philosophical theology' in the scholastic sense of this <strong>te</strong>rm". In<br />
the canon of Islamic sciences relating to God's revelation, kalàm<br />
differs from fiqh (the science of divine Law) because it uses human<br />
reasoning as much as possible in discussing the articles of faith".<br />
Because of this, many of the Hanbali<strong>te</strong> fuqahä' (experts of<br />
jurisprudence) strongly opposed kaläm because it trus<strong>te</strong>d human 'aql<br />
or ratio and its dialectical arguments too much, and therefore failed in<br />
trusting God's revelation". The science of kaläm differs from falsafa<br />
(philosophy) as well, because it expressly deals with theological<br />
issues, while "the faläsifa were philosophers first and men of religion<br />
af<strong>te</strong>rwards" 53.<br />
Being an endeavour to reflect on the con<strong>te</strong>nts of God's<br />
revelation by using one's powers of comprehension, Islamic kaläm is<br />
methodically qui<strong>te</strong> akin to medieval scholastic theology. In a famous<br />
'essay at comparative theology', Gardet and Anawati have shown<br />
these likenesses, both as to con<strong>te</strong>nts and as to methods". But, in<br />
comparison to the Christian writings of the Patristic era, the kaläm is<br />
charac<strong>te</strong>rized by its apologetic method: it tries to defend the religious<br />
convictions of the Muslims". A comparison between the methods of<br />
kaläm and of Christian scholastic theology yields the same results:<br />
while Christian sys<strong>te</strong>matic theology up to and including <strong>Thomas</strong><br />
50 M. Abdel Haleem, a.c., p. 71; W. Montgomery Watt, Islamic<br />
Philosophy and Theology: an Ex<strong>te</strong>nded Survey, Edinburgh 1985, p. 37.<br />
51. Wolfson, o.c., pA, with reference to the famous Muslim<br />
historiographer Ibn Khaldün.<br />
52 L. Gardet, s.v. '''ilm al-kaläm", The Encyclopedia of Islam, new<br />
edition (= Er), Vol. ill, Leiden I London 1971, pp. 1141-1150, here 1149.<br />
One is <strong>te</strong>mp<strong>te</strong>d to draw a parallel between this Hanbali<strong>te</strong> critique and the<br />
objections brought forward against the dialectical methods of Pe<strong>te</strong>r Abelard by<br />
Bernard of Clairvaux.<br />
53 Gardet, Er, ill, 1148, quoting Ahmad Amïn.<br />
54 L. Gardet et M.-M. Anawati, Introduction à la théologie<br />
Musulmane: essai de théologie comparée (Études de philosophie médiévale,<br />
37), Paris 1948.<br />
ss Gardet I Anawati, o.c., p. 211, p. 237.