23.09.2013 Views

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1997 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARE GOD AND HUMAN CREATURES FREE? 125<br />

of Aristo<strong>te</strong>lian elements in the <strong>Thomas</strong>ian development is qui<strong>te</strong><br />

in<strong>te</strong>resting in its own right, but a straightforward Aristo<strong>te</strong>lization is<br />

qui<strong>te</strong> a different thing and leaves aside the <strong>te</strong>nsion between the<br />

Scriptum and the la<strong>te</strong>r <strong>Thomas</strong> and the <strong>te</strong>nsion between the Scriptum<br />

and Parisian and Oxonian theology in the second quar<strong>te</strong>r of the<br />

thir<strong>te</strong>enth century.<br />

4.6 <strong>Thomas</strong>' modal semantics. The so-called <strong>te</strong>mporal necessity is<br />

not a problematic aspect if it is properly defined. Thus the precise<br />

con<strong>te</strong>nts of the <strong>Thomas</strong>ian notions of necessity, possibility and<br />

contingency are at stake. Here the results of chap<strong>te</strong>r 7 are not clear.<br />

The semantic list of page 258 is rejec<strong>te</strong>d, the list of page 257 is not<br />

applicable. <strong>Thomas</strong> himself <strong>te</strong>lls us that possibile is a modus of truth.<br />

Therefore:<br />

Pp=+p & -Np & --Mp.<br />

This structure seems to boil down to contingent truth (267, no<strong>te</strong> 32),<br />

but is it contingent truth in a diachronic or synchronic way? IX<br />

Metaphysica 1, 1773 decides in favour of the diachronic in<strong>te</strong>rpretation,<br />

but is this the voice of Saint <strong>Thomas</strong> or of Aristotle? However, it is<br />

argued for 'prop<strong>te</strong>r habitudinem praedicati ad subiectum'.<br />

Nevertheless, the author concludes that this possibile absolu<strong>te</strong> is what<br />

is Iogically possible (268), but this is not true. If the praedicatum non<br />

repugnat subiecto, then this possibility is sometimes true and the<br />

opposi<strong>te</strong> is sometimes true. The other way round, possibile II is not<br />

absolu<strong>te</strong>ly possible. So the <strong>te</strong>rminological harvest is not clear, as the<br />

author himself also indica<strong>te</strong>s. The essence - po<strong>te</strong>ncy hypothesis about<br />

modalities' is a real contribution, but does not <strong>te</strong>ll us how we have to<br />

take the ontological modalities of the divine knowledge and the divine<br />

will. If divine knowledge is necessary, God's creation and providence<br />

have to be understood within this ontic con<strong>te</strong>xt.<br />

5. Contributing to understanding Saint <strong>Thomas</strong>: mat<strong>te</strong>rs of<br />

chronology<br />

In general, questions of development in medieval thought have only<br />

recently come to the fore. Not many years ago the <strong>te</strong>rms Middle Ages<br />

and development/evolution were considered to be diametrically<br />

opposed to one another, because there was only one medieval type of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!