12.10.2013 Views

Download the report - Femise

Download the report - Femise

Download the report - Femise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

also practicing abroad, mainly in <strong>the</strong> UK, USA, Germany and Austria. Swedish doctors<br />

are practicing in Norway, and <strong>the</strong> US.<br />

I.3.3 Quantifying <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> EU enlargement<br />

In Europe, <strong>the</strong> accession of more countries to <strong>the</strong> European Union in 2004 and 2007<br />

increased <strong>the</strong> scope for mobility among health workers and raised additional issues within<br />

<strong>the</strong> European context. In particular, ten new Member states were added in 2004, and two<br />

in 2007. Some countries, particularly those located in <strong>the</strong> eastern part of <strong>the</strong> region, are<br />

concerned about <strong>the</strong> outflows of health workers as a result from accession or that might<br />

also increase as <strong>the</strong>y are part of a larger market for mobility of health professionals. In<br />

fact, this enlargement extended <strong>the</strong> European labor market for health professionals. The<br />

portability of health professional qualifications was guaranteed by <strong>the</strong> European treaties,<br />

establishing a free movement area. This facilitated <strong>the</strong> recognition of diplomas for<br />

medical doctors, nurses, dentists and o<strong>the</strong>r health workers. Enlargement also provided<br />

new incentives to work elsewhere due to lower salary levels in <strong>the</strong> accession countries.<br />

The economics literature attempts to predict future migration flows from <strong>the</strong> accession<br />

EU countries based on econometric models using as input past immigration flows from<br />

countries o<strong>the</strong>r than ECE countries (for example, Boeri and Brücker, 2000; Fertig, 2001;<br />

Bauer and Zimmermann, 1999 ). The <strong>the</strong>oretical bases for <strong>the</strong> empirical specification are<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic arguments that relate migration to differences in returns to human capital<br />

and costs of migration (for instance, Harris and Todaro, 1970). Boeri and Brücker (2000)<br />

use <strong>the</strong>ir model to predict migration flows from <strong>the</strong> CEECs 70 , Bulgaria, Romania, to<br />

Germany. They take <strong>the</strong> distribution of immigrants from <strong>the</strong> CEEC-10 to <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Union in 1998 and use it to extrapolate <strong>the</strong>ir predictions. They assume that <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

number of migrants going to each European country is going to remain to <strong>the</strong> same level<br />

as in 1998 and <strong>the</strong>y forecast future migration flows to <strong>the</strong> whole EU-15 from <strong>the</strong> CEEC-<br />

10. Fertig (2001) only predicts <strong>the</strong> number of potential migrants from <strong>the</strong> CEEC-10 to<br />

Germany. Bauer and Zimmermann (1999) predict <strong>the</strong> percentage of <strong>the</strong> population in<br />

certain CEECs which will migrate to <strong>the</strong> EU.<br />

70 The CEECs countries are Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and<br />

Slovenia. CEECs-10 is <strong>the</strong> CEECs plus Bulgaria and Romania.<br />

! '%!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!