Download the report - Femise
Download the report - Femise
Download the report - Femise
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
also practicing abroad, mainly in <strong>the</strong> UK, USA, Germany and Austria. Swedish doctors<br />
are practicing in Norway, and <strong>the</strong> US.<br />
I.3.3 Quantifying <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> EU enlargement<br />
In Europe, <strong>the</strong> accession of more countries to <strong>the</strong> European Union in 2004 and 2007<br />
increased <strong>the</strong> scope for mobility among health workers and raised additional issues within<br />
<strong>the</strong> European context. In particular, ten new Member states were added in 2004, and two<br />
in 2007. Some countries, particularly those located in <strong>the</strong> eastern part of <strong>the</strong> region, are<br />
concerned about <strong>the</strong> outflows of health workers as a result from accession or that might<br />
also increase as <strong>the</strong>y are part of a larger market for mobility of health professionals. In<br />
fact, this enlargement extended <strong>the</strong> European labor market for health professionals. The<br />
portability of health professional qualifications was guaranteed by <strong>the</strong> European treaties,<br />
establishing a free movement area. This facilitated <strong>the</strong> recognition of diplomas for<br />
medical doctors, nurses, dentists and o<strong>the</strong>r health workers. Enlargement also provided<br />
new incentives to work elsewhere due to lower salary levels in <strong>the</strong> accession countries.<br />
The economics literature attempts to predict future migration flows from <strong>the</strong> accession<br />
EU countries based on econometric models using as input past immigration flows from<br />
countries o<strong>the</strong>r than ECE countries (for example, Boeri and Brücker, 2000; Fertig, 2001;<br />
Bauer and Zimmermann, 1999 ). The <strong>the</strong>oretical bases for <strong>the</strong> empirical specification are<br />
<strong>the</strong> economic arguments that relate migration to differences in returns to human capital<br />
and costs of migration (for instance, Harris and Todaro, 1970). Boeri and Brücker (2000)<br />
use <strong>the</strong>ir model to predict migration flows from <strong>the</strong> CEECs 70 , Bulgaria, Romania, to<br />
Germany. They take <strong>the</strong> distribution of immigrants from <strong>the</strong> CEEC-10 to <strong>the</strong> European<br />
Union in 1998 and use it to extrapolate <strong>the</strong>ir predictions. They assume that <strong>the</strong> relative<br />
number of migrants going to each European country is going to remain to <strong>the</strong> same level<br />
as in 1998 and <strong>the</strong>y forecast future migration flows to <strong>the</strong> whole EU-15 from <strong>the</strong> CEEC-<br />
10. Fertig (2001) only predicts <strong>the</strong> number of potential migrants from <strong>the</strong> CEEC-10 to<br />
Germany. Bauer and Zimmermann (1999) predict <strong>the</strong> percentage of <strong>the</strong> population in<br />
certain CEECs which will migrate to <strong>the</strong> EU.<br />
70 The CEECs countries are Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and<br />
Slovenia. CEECs-10 is <strong>the</strong> CEECs plus Bulgaria and Romania.<br />
! '%!