Download the report - Femise

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2005, 530 hospital doctors, 340 dental practitioners, 950 nurses and 410 nursing auxiliaries and assistants were registered in the Worker Registration Scheme as coming from the new EU member states (Dumont and Zurn, 2007). García Perez et al. (2007) point out that according to the information available for emigration in recent years does not indicate an effect of the EU enlargement in the exodous of doctors from new member states to Norway, France or Germany. We can also measure outflows of health professionals based on the intention to leave which was not as large as anticipated before accession. Outflows have not exceeded the 3% of domestic workforce. Although this intention to leave data should be interpreted with care and might also differ greatly from the actual outflows. The latest WHO report shows that net winners of the enlargement have been predominantly those in the EU 15. For instance, France experienced a higher increase in the number of doctors coming from Romania. Spain and also the United Kingdom report important increases in the inflows of doctors from Poland and Romania. The main effect of the enlargement was to reinforce the inflows from Eastern and Central EU member states towards western parts of the EU. Nevertheless, it is very soon to draw conclusions on the effects of EU enlargement. Recent data from Estonia, Hungary (for the years 2009 and 2010) reveal a new increase in outflows due to the economic recession. I.3.4 Motives to immigrate: Pull and push factors The motives for migrating are often characterized as “push” and “pull factors”. Buchan et al. (2003) summarizes some of the possible main push and pull factors related to health workers (see Table 2). Table I.3.4.1: Main “pull” and “push” factors in migration and international recruitment of health workers Push factors Pull factors Low pay Higher pay Poor working conditions Opportunities for remittances Lack of resources Better working conditions Limited career opportunities Career opportunities Limited educational opportunities Better resourced health systems Provision of post basic education ! ''!
Specific factors Impact of HIV/AIDS Economic instability Unstable work environment Political stability Travel opportunities Aid work One of the main motivations to migrate is income. Some surveys reveal that income was found to be one of the key motivations for health professionals in Estonia, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. For instance, wage differentials motivate Romanian health professionals to work up in countries where they can earn up to three times more. Also, outflows of medical doctors to Spain dropped in Spain in the mid and late 200s when salary levels rose. Gathering data on remuneration levels is quite difficult because countries collect data based on different sources covering different categories of physicians, and often do not include all income sources. Data on remuneration refers to GPs. The remuneration of GPs ranges from 1.4 times the average wage of all workers in Hungary, to 4.2 times in UK. In all countries, the remuneration of GPs is lower than that of specialists (OECD, 2009). The other most cited motivation is the working conditions, covering elements such as the working environment, terms of employment, working relations. For instance, better working hours is one of the main motivations for Austrian doctors to move to Germany. In 1990s, job insecurity and temporary contracts drove Spanish health professionals to search for a job in Portugal. The latest report about EU (WHO, 2011) indicates that salaries and working conditions were expected to attract medical doctors to some European countries. Nevertheless, these inflows were lower than one might expect due to labor market restrictions in several EU 15 member states. This report also mentions that as an important incentive to migrate is a perception of better salaries and opportunities. Lastly, the possibilities of professional and career advancement are one of the key motivations for Finnish doctors to work abroad. Austrian doctors are attracted to Germany for the absence of waiting times for training places. ! '(!
Page 1 and 2:
F E M I S E R E S E A R C H P R O G
Page 3 and 4:
What Can Be Learnt from the New Eco
Page 5 and 6:
AMGA: American Medical Group Associ
Page 7 and 8:
USA: United State of America WB: Wo
Page 9 and 10:
medical doctors are then free to en
Page 11 and 12:
elate to quality research and educa
Page 13 and 14:
This may concern also EU countries
Page 15 and 16:
discussed both in theory and practi
Page 17 and 18:
EU are then described and discussed
Page 19 and 20:
specialties. This study shows that
Page 21 and 22:
with this trade. Special arrangemen
Page 23 and 24:
into the developed countries; where
Page 25 and 26:
them as follow: Cross-border delive
Page 27 and 28: In this regard, the EU is suggestin
Page 29 and 30: Given the importance of health care
Page 31 and 32: Serbia. Low wages, poor working con
Page 33 and 34: • How does tertiary education wit
Page 35 and 36: Driouchi & Kadiri (2010) are promis
Page 37 and 38: annual living costs per student. Th
Page 39 and 40: Lithuania 4.12 4.15 4.01 4.03 3.97
Page 41 and 42: Egypt 67.57 68.86 70.17 71.52 72.89
Page 43 and 44: observed externally from developing
Page 45 and 46: Relative Wages : MIN MENA / By comp
Page 47 and 48: No future, Heavy workload, to save
Page 49 and 50: one-year qualification apprenticesh
Page 51 and 52: Other European Countries Austria 4
Page 53 and 54: one medical university and studies
Page 55 and 56: includes a three-year vocational tr
Page 57 and 58: has 18 medical universities and stu
Page 59 and 60: général du Gouvernement to gradua
Page 61 and 62: of Medical Science, Bachelor of Med
Page 63 and 64: Egypt Iran 29463 31445 32134 25990
Page 65 and 66: major policies and strategies relat
Page 67 and 68: The aim of this sub-part is to prov
Page 69 and 70: • What is the role of mobility of
Page 71 and 72: Commonwealth of Independent states
Page 73 and 74: Dodani and LaPorte (2005) suggest t
Page 75 and 76: In regards to the mobility of Europ
Page 77: The general conclusions of these th
Page 81 and 82: Portugal X X Romania X X X Russian
Page 83 and 84: Germany Italy Spain Lithuania Slova
Page 85 and 86: Italy (2%) and Russia (4) in 2008 (
Page 87 and 88: theory assumes perfect transferabil
Page 89 and 90: The data available suggest potentia
Page 91 and 92: This chapter deals with the migrati
Page 93 and 94: networks and on the major channels
Page 95 and 96: assumed here that emigration decisi
Page 97 and 98: Increases (respectively decreases)
Page 99 and 100: Figure II.1.2: The shape of H as a
Page 101 and 102: The optimal emigration rate that ca
Page 103 and 104: Figure II.1.4: Effects of the Level
Page 105 and 106: empirical investigation focuses on
Page 107 and 108: Table II.1.3.1: Country annual tren
Page 109 and 110: Table II.1.3.2: Country annual tren
Page 111 and 112: ! ! C/D>)! 01::! 0103! 5881::7! E#%
Page 113 and 114: "#$%&'!()*)+!Eurostat Database Abou
Page 115 and 116: Using these parameter estimates, co
Page 117 and 118: different websites for different co
Page 119 and 120: the theoretical values of the relat
Page 121 and 122: p-value 0.33 0.03 t test 0.99 2.25
Page 123 and 124: The following set of graphs are the
Page 125 and 126: The countries with higher number of
Page 127 and 128: Turkey (m*=0.41, m**=0.77) Yemen (m
Page 129 and 130:
periods but should be concerned abo
Page 131 and 132:
health report “Comptes Nationaux
Page 133 and 134:
In accordance with the health insur
Page 135 and 136:
95 adults >15 years old per 100000
Page 137 and 138:
To achieve progress in the health s
Page 139 and 140:
The external problems comprise (1)
Page 141 and 142:
first four hospital universities ex
Page 143 and 144:
monitoring trends and economic fact
Page 145 and 146:
Other support staff 6300 2.11 2004
Page 147 and 148:
areas, the case of doctors who reti
Page 149 and 150:
areas of Morocco. It is computed ye
Page 151 and 152:
political instability, economic dep
Page 153 and 154:
1. Gender VS Intention to Migrate A
Page 155 and 156:
salaries differs according to the w
Page 157 and 158:
Results The results are given below
Page 159 and 160:
These results suggest that the numb
Page 161 and 162:
Finally, the questionnaire records
Page 163 and 164:
The past decades have witnessed an
Page 165 and 166:
changed the notion of space, where
Page 167 and 168:
implications on health, Huynen et a
Page 169 and 170:
Figure III.1.3: Social stratificati
Page 171 and 172:
Lee et al., (2007) primarily focus
Page 173 and 174:
However, Collins (203) does recogni
Page 175 and 176:
America. In Africa, where there are
Page 177 and 178:
physicians from Liberia practice in
Page 179 and 180:
Figure III.1.7: Migrant care worker
Page 181 and 182:
espectively. An interesting particu
Page 183 and 184:
Table III.1.5: Supply of foreign (-
Page 185 and 186:
Table III.1.6: Health care wages in
Page 187 and 188:
Figure II.1.11: Factors affecting h
Page 189 and 190:
Figure III.1.12: Factors contributi
Page 191 and 192:
Table III.1.10: International Quali
Page 193 and 194:
health as integral to wellbeing thr
Page 195 and 196:
III.2.1 Need for A cooperative Fram
Page 197 and 198:
graduate spends of certain number o
Page 199 and 200:
III.2.2 Migration of Medical Doctor
Page 201 and 202:
The convexity condition is simply a
Page 203 and 204:
• A payoff vector (ai)i S is said
Page 205 and 206:
III.2.2.2 Discussion and Public Pol
Page 207 and 208:
Europe. Second, in the North Africa
Page 209 and 210:
In the short run, the country of or
Page 211 and 212:
great incentive for medical student
Page 213 and 214:
system, and therefore to the rest o
Page 215 and 216:
MENA countries could be moving to p
Page 217 and 218:
of their medical school. The other
Page 219 and 220:
Beine, M., Docquier, F. & Rapoport,
Page 221 and 222:
German Medical Association.(2011).
Page 223 and 224:
World Bank Database, 2007. World Ba
Page 225 and 226:
http://gse.buffalo.edu/org/inthighe
Page 227 and 228:
Berland, Y. (2002). Demographie des
Page 229 and 230:
Gericke, C.A. (2006). Finance healt
Page 231 and 232:
Salehi-Isfahani, D., Tunali, I., As
Page 233 and 234:
Beine, M., Docquier, F. & Rapoport,
Page 235 and 236:
Docquier, F., Lohest, O. & Marfouk,
Page 237 and 238:
Labdelaoui, H. (2010). Les dimensio
Page 239 and 240:
Stark, O. (1991), The Migration of
Page 241 and 242:
WHO - World Health Organization (20
Page 243 and 244:
Linacre, S. (2007). “Migration: p
Page 245 and 246:
Challenging Inequities in Health: F
Page 247 and 248:
Mullan, F. (2007). Doctors and Socc
Page 249 and 250:
Vujicic M, Zurn P, Diallo K, Dal Po
Page 251 and 252:
Collins, T. (2003). Globalization,
Page 253 and 254:
Kana, M.A., (2009). From Brain Drai
Page 255 and 256:
Sagoe, K. (2004). Using the Diaspor
Page 257 and 258:
Sub-part II.1: Appendix I Appendice
Page 259 and 260:
means that So if , then: > which is
Page 261 and 262:
A, B,C>0 and , , Then Demo 5: Sign
Page 263 and 264:
t test 3.21788138 1.86856175 3.1713
Page 265 and 266:
Lithuania Years m Relative wage H/H
Page 267 and 268:
Romania Years m Relative wage H/H0
Page 269 and 270:
MENA Countries Risk Neutral Model C
Page 271 and 272:
Tunisia Turkey 1993 0.1781 2.50 1.9
Page 273 and 274:
Syria Tunisia Turkey Yemen Stand.de
Page 275 and 276:
Morocco Syria Tunisia t-stat (theor
Page 277 and 278:
Risk aversion model summary table C
Page 279 and 280:
Table II-2-1.2: Projections of the
Page 281 and 282:
Observations 5 Coefficients Erreur-
Page 283 and 284:
Figure 4: Age distribution within r
Page 285 and 286:
Figure 11: Migration conditions dis
Page 287 and 288:
! "(&!
Page 289 and 290:
! "((!
Page 291 and 292:
! ")+!
Page 293 and 294:
! ")"!
Page 295 and 296:
! ")$!
Page 297:
! ")&!
show all

Download the report - Femise

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?