Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Since employment opportunities were limited in <strong>Kerala</strong> due<br />
to low industrial growth, the rapidly growing and surplus<br />
working age population was absorbed for employment in<br />
the Gulf countries. In other words, the demographic window<br />
worked as a push factor for large-scale migration that brought<br />
remittances to the State, which induced a consumptionbased<br />
economic growth in <strong>Kerala</strong>. The next section analyses<br />
the quantum <strong>of</strong> remittances, the consumption boom and<br />
investment initiatives.<br />
2.2 Migration and Reforms: The Catalysts<br />
2.2.1 Remittances and Growth<br />
Taking human resource as a product <strong>of</strong> the State, <strong>Kerala</strong><br />
may be one <strong>of</strong> the largest exporters <strong>of</strong> resourceful minds<br />
and gifted pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to other parts <strong>of</strong> the country, a<br />
process that has its origins in the World War II period.<br />
The accelerated process <strong>of</strong> emigration, especially the<br />
more recent emigration to the Gulf and to North America,<br />
has had its impact on every facet <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>’s economy<br />
and society. However, this impact was not sufficient for<br />
bringing about an accelerated growth in the State; an<br />
enabling environment appears to have been provided by<br />
the economic reforms specified below.<br />
The turnaround in growth in <strong>Kerala</strong> came immediately<br />
after the economic reforms that were initiated during the<br />
mid-1980s. However, for a low income, weak industrial<br />
base economy like <strong>Kerala</strong>, the economic reforms per se<br />
could not have triggered a high growth regime spanning<br />
over a period <strong>of</strong> one-and-a-half decade. Hence, the fuel<br />
for it must have been external, in the form <strong>of</strong> the flow<br />
<strong>of</strong> remittances. An important outcome <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
reforms, i.e., the discontinuation <strong>of</strong> the fixed exchange<br />
rate system in favour <strong>of</strong> a market-determined one, seems<br />
to have boosted remittances. It meant a higher growth in<br />
remittance income as a result <strong>of</strong> the depreciation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Rupee. Thus, it is the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the linkage <strong>of</strong> human<br />
development, through migration and remittances, with<br />
economic reform that has helped <strong>Kerala</strong>’s economy<br />
break out <strong>of</strong> the low growth/stagnation trap it was in<br />
prior to 1987.<br />
Until the 1970s, international migration from <strong>Kerala</strong><br />
had been relevant only for its demonstration effect and<br />
as a means for upward social mobility. A small number<br />
<strong>of</strong> emigrants had gone to South-East Asian countries,<br />
Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Malaysia, Singapore, etc., and their<br />
CHAPTER 5<br />
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH 77<br />
emigration had enabled their families to improve their<br />
socio-economic status, as judged by land ownership,<br />
good housing and better education for children.<br />
The positive gains <strong>of</strong> these pioneers was a major factor<br />
contributing to the acceleration <strong>of</strong> emigration from the<br />
State to the other regions <strong>of</strong> the world when opportunities<br />
emerged. Large-scale emigration from the State began only<br />
in the 1970s. The Middle East countries were the destination<br />
<strong>of</strong> 95 per cent <strong>of</strong> the emigrants, with Saudi Arabia alone<br />
accounting for nearly 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total. Outside the<br />
Arab world, the principal destination <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong> emigrants<br />
was the United States, which accounted for 2.2 per cent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the total.<br />
As already stated, the revival <strong>of</strong> growth in the <strong>Kerala</strong><br />
economy since the late 1980s brings into prominence the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> remittances, attempts to quantify which have been<br />
detailed in Chapter 3. The increase in per capita income as<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> the remittances has, in the presence <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
reforms, had two positive effects in favour <strong>of</strong> growth:<br />
Increase in (i) consumption and savings <strong>of</strong> the people and<br />
(ii) new investment initiatives in <strong>Kerala</strong>.<br />
2.2.2 The Consumption Boom<br />
The consumption pattern in <strong>Kerala</strong> has undergone<br />
significant changes due to the flow <strong>of</strong> remittances as well<br />
as the nature <strong>of</strong> demographic transition. The average<br />
per capita consumer expenditure in <strong>Kerala</strong> was below<br />
the national average till 1977-78. Since then, this has far<br />
exceeded that <strong>of</strong> India, progressively reaching 41 per cent<br />
above the national average in 1999-2000. This could not<br />
have been possible but for the accrual <strong>of</strong> extra income in<br />
the form <strong>of</strong> remittances.<br />
Besides the phenomenal rise in consumer expenditure,<br />
it is its compositional change that is <strong>of</strong> further interest<br />
here, as it provides enough indications <strong>of</strong> its impact on<br />
various sectors <strong>of</strong> the economy. It is a well-known fact<br />
that as income increases, the proportion <strong>of</strong> expenditure by<br />
the households on non-food items also rises significantly.<br />
This, in turn, also implies substantial flourishing <strong>of</strong> trade<br />
and related services. And in the context <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>, we<br />
find this development rule very much in force, as is<br />
evidenced in the results from the three surveys by National<br />
Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO; 35th round, 1983;<br />
52nd round, 1993-94; 55th round, 1999-2000) that<br />
provide proportions <strong>of</strong> consumer expenditure on food<br />
items and non-food items. 4<br />
4 See Pushpangadan (2003: Appendix 1) for details.