03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 9<br />

Decentralised Governance<br />

and Human Development<br />

THE KERALA EXPERIENCE<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Local bodies in <strong>Kerala</strong>, 1 though extant for a long period, had very limited powers<br />

as self-governing local development institutions and were primarily conduits for<br />

schemes designed and funded by State/Central ministries. With the 73rd and 74th<br />

Constitutional Amendments in 1993, <strong>Kerala</strong> embarked on the task <strong>of</strong> inducting<br />

the Panchayati Raj institutions into the governance structures in the state. True<br />

to the history <strong>of</strong> public action in <strong>Kerala</strong>, the agenda <strong>of</strong> decentralisation has been<br />

so integrated into the public discourse on development that it too, appears to<br />

have become institutionalised. And this has ensured continuous commitment to<br />

decentralisation by successive Governments.<br />

It is generally recognised that decentralisation, as implemented in <strong>Kerala</strong>, has not<br />

only enhanced her capability vector but also had considerable impact on quality,<br />

efficacy and inclusiveness <strong>of</strong> that development. 2 The local bodies are charged<br />

with a number <strong>of</strong> developmental functions and taken together they represent<br />

the ingredients for enhancing basic human development. These are individual/<br />

household benefit programmes such as housing, distribution <strong>of</strong> income earning<br />

assets as well as those that enhance the supply <strong>of</strong> public and collective goods<br />

such as roads, schools and public health care centres. However, that problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> transparency and accountability, poor vertical integration <strong>of</strong> local level plans,<br />

under-utilisation <strong>of</strong> funds and capacity enhancement <strong>of</strong> functionaries remain,<br />

cannot also be denied. For instance, while on the one hand it has opened the<br />

public sphere for the hitherto socially marginalised groups such as the Scheduled<br />

Castes/Scheduled Tribes and the politically excluded women in proportions<br />

never seen before, transformatory outcomes for such groups is still elusive.<br />

1 The State has at present 991 Grama Panchayats, 152 Block Panchayats, 14 District Panchayats, 53 Municipalities and 5<br />

Corporations (situation at the time <strong>of</strong> the 2000 elections to local bodies). In order to make the administration <strong>of</strong> the panchayats<br />

efficient, large sized panchayats having large populations were divided and 20 new grama panchayats were formed. These<br />

panchayats came into existence from October 2000 and 11 grama panchayats were delinked.<br />

2 See for details Chaudhuri et al, 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!