Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 9<br />
Decentralised Governance<br />
and Human Development<br />
THE KERALA EXPERIENCE<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Local bodies in <strong>Kerala</strong>, 1 though extant for a long period, had very limited powers<br />
as self-governing local development institutions and were primarily conduits for<br />
schemes designed and funded by State/Central ministries. With the 73rd and 74th<br />
Constitutional Amendments in 1993, <strong>Kerala</strong> embarked on the task <strong>of</strong> inducting<br />
the Panchayati Raj institutions into the governance structures in the state. True<br />
to the history <strong>of</strong> public action in <strong>Kerala</strong>, the agenda <strong>of</strong> decentralisation has been<br />
so integrated into the public discourse on development that it too, appears to<br />
have become institutionalised. And this has ensured continuous commitment to<br />
decentralisation by successive Governments.<br />
It is generally recognised that decentralisation, as implemented in <strong>Kerala</strong>, has not<br />
only enhanced her capability vector but also had considerable impact on quality,<br />
efficacy and inclusiveness <strong>of</strong> that development. 2 The local bodies are charged<br />
with a number <strong>of</strong> developmental functions and taken together they represent<br />
the ingredients for enhancing basic human development. These are individual/<br />
household benefit programmes such as housing, distribution <strong>of</strong> income earning<br />
assets as well as those that enhance the supply <strong>of</strong> public and collective goods<br />
such as roads, schools and public health care centres. However, that problems<br />
<strong>of</strong> transparency and accountability, poor vertical integration <strong>of</strong> local level plans,<br />
under-utilisation <strong>of</strong> funds and capacity enhancement <strong>of</strong> functionaries remain,<br />
cannot also be denied. For instance, while on the one hand it has opened the<br />
public sphere for the hitherto socially marginalised groups such as the Scheduled<br />
Castes/Scheduled Tribes and the politically excluded women in proportions<br />
never seen before, transformatory outcomes for such groups is still elusive.<br />
1 The State has at present 991 Grama Panchayats, 152 Block Panchayats, 14 District Panchayats, 53 Municipalities and 5<br />
Corporations (situation at the time <strong>of</strong> the 2000 elections to local bodies). In order to make the administration <strong>of</strong> the panchayats<br />
efficient, large sized panchayats having large populations were divided and 20 new grama panchayats were formed. These<br />
panchayats came into existence from October 2000 and 11 grama panchayats were delinked.<br />
2 See for details Chaudhuri et al, 2004.