Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 7<br />
RECKONING CAUTION: EDUCATED UNEMPLOYMENT AND GENDER UNFREEDOM<br />
101<br />
the State. However, while there was a decline in female<br />
WPRs in both rural and urban areas at the all-India level<br />
in the 1990s (Sundaram, 2001), there has been greater<br />
stability in <strong>Kerala</strong>. (Table 7.1). Besides about one-fifth <strong>of</strong><br />
women in urban <strong>Kerala</strong> are employed compared to less<br />
than 14 per cent at the all-India level.<br />
Disaggregation by activity status added complexity<br />
to this finding. The number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong> work for those<br />
usually employed is much higher for women in rural<br />
and urban India than in <strong>Kerala</strong> and it had increased<br />
between 1993-94 and 1999-00. In <strong>Kerala</strong>, the number <strong>of</strong><br />
working days between 1993-94 and 1999-00 declined<br />
in rural areas and showed no change in urban areas.<br />
In the same period, urban <strong>Kerala</strong> also showed an<br />
increase in the number <strong>of</strong> days women reported ‘not<br />
seeking/not available for work’, i.e., were not in the<br />
labour force (Table 7.2).<br />
It is well known that women in <strong>Kerala</strong> enjoy higher wage<br />
rates (casual) in both rural and urban areas than in other<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the country and hence their annual earnings<br />
may still be higher. It is then possible that bolstered by<br />
increasing male WPRs and higher household earnings,<br />
women are withdrawing from paid work into full-time<br />
domesticity for significant parts <strong>of</strong> the year. There is<br />
a tendency for women to focus on activities in and<br />
around the home. Data collected by the NSSO showed<br />
that a higher proportion <strong>of</strong> housewives in <strong>Kerala</strong>, by<br />
main occupation, were engaged in the maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />
kitchen garden, poultry and cattle and free tutoring <strong>of</strong><br />
own/other’s children than at the all-India level 2<br />
(Appendix Table A7.1 at the end <strong>of</strong> this chapter).<br />
Reflecting the greater commercialisation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>’s<br />
economy, there were fewer housewives taking part<br />
in several activities <strong>of</strong> a subsistence kind, such as<br />
husking <strong>of</strong> own paddy, free collection <strong>of</strong> firewood<br />
or preparation <strong>of</strong> cow dung cakes. There is also a<br />
suggestion that women’s better educational pr<strong>of</strong>ile in<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong> is being capitalised on in home-bound unpaid<br />
work – 142 per 1,000 women in <strong>Kerala</strong> compared to<br />
48 per 1,000 in India participate in free tutoring <strong>of</strong><br />
own/others’ children.<br />
However, low economic status brings pressure on women<br />
to seek work for pay as is reflected in the much higher<br />
WPRs among the SC/ST women in <strong>Kerala</strong> as elsewhere<br />
(Table 7.3). Male WPRs are also higher among the<br />
SC/ST populations but not among OBCs. The rural work<br />
participation rates were 41 per cent for ST women,<br />
Table 7.2: Activity – Status Distribution <strong>of</strong> Person – Days per Year <strong>of</strong> Usually Employed Workers<br />
(Principal and Subsidiary Status)<br />
Activity Status Rural Females Urban Females<br />
1987-88 1993-94 1999-00 1987-88 1993-94 1999-00<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong><br />
Employed 193 216 211 213 248 248<br />
Unemployed 20 16 26 31 19 14<br />
Not in Labour Force 152 133 128 122 99 103<br />
India<br />
Employed 233 242 247 261 280 289<br />
Unemployed 9 15 14 14 8 8<br />
Not in Labour Force 123 112 104 90 77 68<br />
Source: Estimated from data from the Three Rounds.<br />
Table 7.3: Rural Work Participation (Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status) by Social Category<br />
Year Scheduled Tribe Scheduled Caste OBC Others<br />
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female<br />
1987-88 58.2 37.6 50.2 39.5 na na 50.5 26.9<br />
1999-00 72.1 40.8 58.0 32.7 52.8 22.6 57.2 22.1<br />
Source: Kodoth and Eapen (<strong>2005</strong>); na- not available.<br />
2 These are accepted within the domain <strong>of</strong> extended-SNA (system <strong>of</strong> national accounts) activities, which fall outside the SNA<br />
production boundary, but within the general production boundary, a major part <strong>of</strong> which consists <strong>of</strong> unpaid services.