03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 7<br />

RECKONING CAUTION: EDUCATED UNEMPLOYMENT AND GENDER UNFREEDOM<br />

101<br />

the State. However, while there was a decline in female<br />

WPRs in both rural and urban areas at the all-India level<br />

in the 1990s (Sundaram, 2001), there has been greater<br />

stability in <strong>Kerala</strong>. (Table 7.1). Besides about one-fifth <strong>of</strong><br />

women in urban <strong>Kerala</strong> are employed compared to less<br />

than 14 per cent at the all-India level.<br />

Disaggregation by activity status added complexity<br />

to this finding. The number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong> work for those<br />

usually employed is much higher for women in rural<br />

and urban India than in <strong>Kerala</strong> and it had increased<br />

between 1993-94 and 1999-00. In <strong>Kerala</strong>, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

working days between 1993-94 and 1999-00 declined<br />

in rural areas and showed no change in urban areas.<br />

In the same period, urban <strong>Kerala</strong> also showed an<br />

increase in the number <strong>of</strong> days women reported ‘not<br />

seeking/not available for work’, i.e., were not in the<br />

labour force (Table 7.2).<br />

It is well known that women in <strong>Kerala</strong> enjoy higher wage<br />

rates (casual) in both rural and urban areas than in other<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the country and hence their annual earnings<br />

may still be higher. It is then possible that bolstered by<br />

increasing male WPRs and higher household earnings,<br />

women are withdrawing from paid work into full-time<br />

domesticity for significant parts <strong>of</strong> the year. There is<br />

a tendency for women to focus on activities in and<br />

around the home. Data collected by the NSSO showed<br />

that a higher proportion <strong>of</strong> housewives in <strong>Kerala</strong>, by<br />

main occupation, were engaged in the maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

kitchen garden, poultry and cattle and free tutoring <strong>of</strong><br />

own/other’s children than at the all-India level 2<br />

(Appendix Table A7.1 at the end <strong>of</strong> this chapter).<br />

Reflecting the greater commercialisation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>’s<br />

economy, there were fewer housewives taking part<br />

in several activities <strong>of</strong> a subsistence kind, such as<br />

husking <strong>of</strong> own paddy, free collection <strong>of</strong> firewood<br />

or preparation <strong>of</strong> cow dung cakes. There is also a<br />

suggestion that women’s better educational pr<strong>of</strong>ile in<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong> is being capitalised on in home-bound unpaid<br />

work – 142 per 1,000 women in <strong>Kerala</strong> compared to<br />

48 per 1,000 in India participate in free tutoring <strong>of</strong><br />

own/others’ children.<br />

However, low economic status brings pressure on women<br />

to seek work for pay as is reflected in the much higher<br />

WPRs among the SC/ST women in <strong>Kerala</strong> as elsewhere<br />

(Table 7.3). Male WPRs are also higher among the<br />

SC/ST populations but not among OBCs. The rural work<br />

participation rates were 41 per cent for ST women,<br />

Table 7.2: Activity – Status Distribution <strong>of</strong> Person – Days per Year <strong>of</strong> Usually Employed Workers<br />

(Principal and Subsidiary Status)<br />

Activity Status Rural Females Urban Females<br />

1987-88 1993-94 1999-00 1987-88 1993-94 1999-00<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong><br />

Employed 193 216 211 213 248 248<br />

Unemployed 20 16 26 31 19 14<br />

Not in Labour Force 152 133 128 122 99 103<br />

India<br />

Employed 233 242 247 261 280 289<br />

Unemployed 9 15 14 14 8 8<br />

Not in Labour Force 123 112 104 90 77 68<br />

Source: Estimated from data from the Three Rounds.<br />

Table 7.3: Rural Work Participation (Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status) by Social Category<br />

Year Scheduled Tribe Scheduled Caste OBC Others<br />

Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female<br />

1987-88 58.2 37.6 50.2 39.5 na na 50.5 26.9<br />

1999-00 72.1 40.8 58.0 32.7 52.8 22.6 57.2 22.1<br />

Source: Kodoth and Eapen (<strong>2005</strong>); na- not available.<br />

2 These are accepted within the domain <strong>of</strong> extended-SNA (system <strong>of</strong> national accounts) activities, which fall outside the SNA<br />

production boundary, but within the general production boundary, a major part <strong>of</strong> which consists <strong>of</strong> unpaid services.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!