03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 7<br />

RECKONING CAUTION: EDUCATED UNEMPLOYMENT AND GENDER UNFREEDOM<br />

111<br />

2.10 High Youth Unemployment<br />

The National Sample Survey also revealed that apart from<br />

the high incidence <strong>of</strong> unemployment among women in<br />

general, the youth seem to have a high unemployment<br />

rate. Young men in the age group <strong>of</strong> 15-25 experience a<br />

high unemployment rate while this is true for the 15-30<br />

age group for women. Women have higher incidence than<br />

men but the difference is much less sharp as compared to<br />

all women and all men. Urban men experience a higher<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment than rural men, but this is somewhat<br />

reversed in the case <strong>of</strong> women. At the all-India level also,<br />

urban unemployment is higher than rural unemployment,<br />

both for men and women.<br />

2.11 Educated Unemployed<br />

That the problem <strong>of</strong> unemployment in <strong>Kerala</strong> is basically<br />

one <strong>of</strong> educated unemployment has already been<br />

highlighted. For those below the primary level <strong>of</strong> education,<br />

chronic unemployment is almost negligible, i.e. less than<br />

2 per cent for the last two decades. While it is around<br />

5 per cent among those with middle school education,<br />

the rate is not high enough to be characterised as very<br />

serious or alarming. In this category, urban women have<br />

the highest incidence <strong>of</strong> unemployment. As educational<br />

attainments increased, the unemployment rates declined to<br />

well over 20 per cent until the early 1990s and further to<br />

around 13 per cent in the late 1990s. The highest incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> unemployment is among those with just secondary level<br />

<strong>of</strong> education, with rates well above 30 per cent throughout<br />

the last two decades. Women experience three times<br />

higher incidence <strong>of</strong> unemployment than this category <strong>of</strong><br />

educated men. However, even among the highly educated<br />

women in <strong>Kerala</strong>, (graduate and above) latest data reveals<br />

that worker participation rates were 37 per cent (urban)<br />

and 32 per cent (rural) compared with 87 per cent and<br />

82 per cent, respectively, for men ( Appendix Table A7.3).<br />

Further, gender disparity in levels <strong>of</strong> educated employment<br />

(ratio <strong>of</strong> male graduate WPR to female graduate WPR) has<br />

widened from 2.0 to 2.4 in the 1990s.<br />

2.12 Rural-Urban Difference in <strong>Kerala</strong> and India<br />

Technically, it will be correct to conclude that unemployment<br />

rates in rural <strong>Kerala</strong> are far higher than at the all-India level.<br />

However, the rural and urban continuum in <strong>Kerala</strong> will<br />

suggest that it is open unemployment. For India there is a<br />

significant rural-urban difference giving rise to the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> a high magnitude <strong>of</strong> ‘disguised unemployment’.<br />

2.13 Income Dimension<br />

The difference between <strong>Kerala</strong> and all-India in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

time measure <strong>of</strong> unemployment gives us some clue to the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the income dimension. While unemployment<br />

at the all-India level, as measured through the NSS, ranges<br />

between 2-3 per cent, the incidence <strong>of</strong> income-poverty was<br />

around 30 per cent in 1999-2000. 7 This means poverty is at<br />

least 10 times the incidence <strong>of</strong> unemployment, pointing to<br />

the low income-earning capacity <strong>of</strong> the employed (e.g. low<br />

wages <strong>of</strong> rural labourers) and/or the existence <strong>of</strong> disguised<br />

unemployment (among the self-employed).<br />

The contrast with <strong>Kerala</strong> should be an eye opener. While<br />

the latest unemployment rate is around 11 per cent, the<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> income-poverty is around 12 per cent, i.e.<br />

more or less the same as the former. Given the fact that<br />

unemployment rates are quite low among the unskilled<br />

(indicated by low levels <strong>of</strong> education), the phenomenon<br />

<strong>of</strong> unemployment is very weakly, if at all, associated<br />

with poverty. This could be the case given the high rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> rural labourers and the possible low level <strong>of</strong><br />

disguised unemployed. However, more broader measures<br />

<strong>of</strong> unemployment indicate that there could be considerable<br />

underemployment in the sense <strong>of</strong> less number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong><br />

work, especially <strong>of</strong> those in casual employment. This, in<br />

fact, is the case.<br />

2.14 Understanding the Problem <strong>of</strong><br />

Educated Unemployed<br />

The 2003 survey attempted a measurement <strong>of</strong> unemployment<br />

based on the current status <strong>of</strong> the sample population at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> survey, though such measurement was not its<br />

primary focus. It was found that 45 per cent <strong>of</strong> those in the<br />

labour force were unemployed. However, if we remove<br />

students (who are also seeking work) from this group,<br />

it comes down to around 38 per cent. By any interpretation,<br />

this is a very high figure.<br />

That educated unemployment is concentrated among the<br />

youth has also been confirmed by our primary survey <strong>of</strong><br />

2003. In general, it is also concentrated among those with<br />

lower educational qualifications (10 or 12 years <strong>of</strong> school<br />

education only) but not necessarily so. Those with degree<br />

7 The incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty as per <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates was reported as 26 per cent. However, there has been a debate on the<br />

methodological aspects <strong>of</strong> this estimation. The un<strong>of</strong>ficial estimate is 30 per cent. See, e.g. Deaton and Dreze (2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!