Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 7<br />
RECKONING CAUTION: EDUCATED UNEMPLOYMENT AND GENDER UNFREEDOM<br />
109<br />
A third dimension was added in terms <strong>of</strong> production<br />
or productivity. This was intended to take care <strong>of</strong><br />
situations where income may increase but without a<br />
corresponding increase in production or productivity<br />
(e.g. salaries <strong>of</strong> Government employees). While this<br />
aspect is not without significance, it is the ‘recognition’<br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> unemployment put forward by Amartya<br />
Sen that has particular importance for <strong>Kerala</strong>. The<br />
recognition aspect refers to the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> people<br />
having a job but nevertheless regarding themselves as<br />
‘unemployed’. This arises from perception <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong><br />
adequacy and self-fulfilment from current employment.<br />
The 2003 survey sought to capture this phenomenon,<br />
believed to be fairly widespread in the <strong>Kerala</strong> context.<br />
2.8 Time Dimension<br />
The time dimension <strong>of</strong> unemployment is sought to<br />
be captured in India through the NSSO survey. Here<br />
again, multiple measures have emerged because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the awareness <strong>of</strong> the importance attached to the<br />
intensity <strong>of</strong> unemployment. 6 The most intense form <strong>of</strong><br />
unemployment is referred to as ‘chronic unemployment'<br />
– defined as 183 or more days spent without work in<br />
the year preceding the survey period. Table 7.9 shows<br />
that according to this measure, the incidence <strong>of</strong> overall<br />
unemployment in <strong>Kerala</strong> has been over four times the<br />
national average for the last 25 years or so. Different<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the time dimension by gender, youth, level <strong>of</strong><br />
education and spatial are examined here.<br />
2.9 Gender and Unemployment<br />
If a single fact were to convey the intensity <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />
<strong>of</strong> unemployment in <strong>Kerala</strong>, it is that unemployment among<br />
women is two to three times higher than among men. And<br />
while educated unemployment has declined for all men in<br />
the 1990s, it has increased for women, particularly in rural<br />
areas. In the urban areas, where it is the highest, female<br />
educated unemployment is 34 per cent in contrast to<br />
7 per cent for men (Table 7.10). While spatial difference<br />
was muted in comparison to that <strong>of</strong> gender, in general,<br />
urban unemployment exceeded rural though there was<br />
some signs <strong>of</strong> a reversal <strong>of</strong> this trend in the case <strong>of</strong> men.<br />
In contrast to <strong>Kerala</strong>, at the all-India level, the spatial<br />
difference was more pronounced than the gender<br />
difference. In fact, in the case <strong>of</strong> rural areas, incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> unemployment among women was lower than that <strong>of</strong><br />
Table 7.10: Unemployment Rates for the Educated<br />
(15 years & above)<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong><br />
All-India<br />
1993-94 1999-00 1993-94 1999-00<br />
Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status<br />
Rural Male 15.6 11.2 6.5 5.6<br />
Rural Female 32.3 36.7 15.0 14.6<br />
Urban Male 11.2 7.4 6.0 6.2<br />
Urban<br />
Female<br />
34.9 34.2 18.2 14.3<br />
Usual Principal Status<br />
Rural Male 18.5 15.0 8.8 6.8<br />
Rural Female 49.6 49.1 24.9 20.4<br />
Urban Male 12.6 9.9 6.9 6.6<br />
Urban<br />
Female<br />
40.6 41.9 20.6 16.3<br />
Source: 1987-88: Sarvekshana, September 1990; 1993-94: Sarvekshana, July-September<br />
1996; 1999-00: “Employment and Unemployment Situation in India”, 1999-2000,<br />
Report No. 458,NSS 55th Round, NSSO, Government <strong>of</strong> India, May 2001<br />
Sarvekshana.<br />
Table 7.9: Incidence <strong>of</strong> Various Measures <strong>of</strong> Unemployment<br />
Year <strong>Kerala</strong> All India <strong>Kerala</strong> All India <strong>Kerala</strong> All India<br />
Chronic Unemployment (UPS) Seasonal Unemployment (CWS) Seasonal Unemployment (CDS)<br />
1977-78 19.8 5.5 12.7 4.9 25.7 8.9<br />
1983 13.1 2.9 15.4 4.7 25.9 8.7<br />
1987-88 17.1 4.2 17.6 5.2 21.2 6.8<br />
1993-94 10.1 2.6 9.7 6.0 15.5 6.0<br />
1999-00 11.4 2.7 12.7 4.3 21.0 7.3<br />
Source: 1987-88: Sarvekshana, September 1990; 1993-94: Sarvekshana, July-September 1996; 1999-00: “Employment and Unemployment Situation in India”, 1999-2000,<br />
Report No. 458,NSS 55th Round, NSSO, Government <strong>of</strong> India, May 2001 Sarvekshana.<br />
6 The National Sample Survey reports mainly three measures <strong>of</strong> unemployment. According to the Usual Principal Status (UPS),<br />
the reference period is 365 days preceding the date <strong>of</strong> survey. If a person is unemployment for a major period, he/she is<br />
unemployed by UPS. Another measure is based on Current Weekly Status (CWS). As per this measure, if a person did not find<br />
work even for one hour in any day previous to the seven-day period, he/she is unemployed. The third measure is based on<br />
Current Daily Status (CDS) wherein each day <strong>of</strong> the previous seven days is classified as working or not working based on one<br />
to four hours as half day and more than four hours as full day.