03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 7<br />

RECKONING CAUTION: EDUCATED UNEMPLOYMENT AND GENDER UNFREEDOM<br />

109<br />

A third dimension was added in terms <strong>of</strong> production<br />

or productivity. This was intended to take care <strong>of</strong><br />

situations where income may increase but without a<br />

corresponding increase in production or productivity<br />

(e.g. salaries <strong>of</strong> Government employees). While this<br />

aspect is not without significance, it is the ‘recognition’<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> unemployment put forward by Amartya<br />

Sen that has particular importance for <strong>Kerala</strong>. The<br />

recognition aspect refers to the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> people<br />

having a job but nevertheless regarding themselves as<br />

‘unemployed’. This arises from perception <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong><br />

adequacy and self-fulfilment from current employment.<br />

The 2003 survey sought to capture this phenomenon,<br />

believed to be fairly widespread in the <strong>Kerala</strong> context.<br />

2.8 Time Dimension<br />

The time dimension <strong>of</strong> unemployment is sought to<br />

be captured in India through the NSSO survey. Here<br />

again, multiple measures have emerged because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the awareness <strong>of</strong> the importance attached to the<br />

intensity <strong>of</strong> unemployment. 6 The most intense form <strong>of</strong><br />

unemployment is referred to as ‘chronic unemployment'<br />

– defined as 183 or more days spent without work in<br />

the year preceding the survey period. Table 7.9 shows<br />

that according to this measure, the incidence <strong>of</strong> overall<br />

unemployment in <strong>Kerala</strong> has been over four times the<br />

national average for the last 25 years or so. Different<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the time dimension by gender, youth, level <strong>of</strong><br />

education and spatial are examined here.<br />

2.9 Gender and Unemployment<br />

If a single fact were to convey the intensity <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> unemployment in <strong>Kerala</strong>, it is that unemployment among<br />

women is two to three times higher than among men. And<br />

while educated unemployment has declined for all men in<br />

the 1990s, it has increased for women, particularly in rural<br />

areas. In the urban areas, where it is the highest, female<br />

educated unemployment is 34 per cent in contrast to<br />

7 per cent for men (Table 7.10). While spatial difference<br />

was muted in comparison to that <strong>of</strong> gender, in general,<br />

urban unemployment exceeded rural though there was<br />

some signs <strong>of</strong> a reversal <strong>of</strong> this trend in the case <strong>of</strong> men.<br />

In contrast to <strong>Kerala</strong>, at the all-India level, the spatial<br />

difference was more pronounced than the gender<br />

difference. In fact, in the case <strong>of</strong> rural areas, incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> unemployment among women was lower than that <strong>of</strong><br />

Table 7.10: Unemployment Rates for the Educated<br />

(15 years & above)<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong><br />

All-India<br />

1993-94 1999-00 1993-94 1999-00<br />

Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status<br />

Rural Male 15.6 11.2 6.5 5.6<br />

Rural Female 32.3 36.7 15.0 14.6<br />

Urban Male 11.2 7.4 6.0 6.2<br />

Urban<br />

Female<br />

34.9 34.2 18.2 14.3<br />

Usual Principal Status<br />

Rural Male 18.5 15.0 8.8 6.8<br />

Rural Female 49.6 49.1 24.9 20.4<br />

Urban Male 12.6 9.9 6.9 6.6<br />

Urban<br />

Female<br />

40.6 41.9 20.6 16.3<br />

Source: 1987-88: Sarvekshana, September 1990; 1993-94: Sarvekshana, July-September<br />

1996; 1999-00: “Employment and Unemployment Situation in India”, 1999-2000,<br />

Report No. 458,NSS 55th Round, NSSO, Government <strong>of</strong> India, May 2001<br />

Sarvekshana.<br />

Table 7.9: Incidence <strong>of</strong> Various Measures <strong>of</strong> Unemployment<br />

Year <strong>Kerala</strong> All India <strong>Kerala</strong> All India <strong>Kerala</strong> All India<br />

Chronic Unemployment (UPS) Seasonal Unemployment (CWS) Seasonal Unemployment (CDS)<br />

1977-78 19.8 5.5 12.7 4.9 25.7 8.9<br />

1983 13.1 2.9 15.4 4.7 25.9 8.7<br />

1987-88 17.1 4.2 17.6 5.2 21.2 6.8<br />

1993-94 10.1 2.6 9.7 6.0 15.5 6.0<br />

1999-00 11.4 2.7 12.7 4.3 21.0 7.3<br />

Source: 1987-88: Sarvekshana, September 1990; 1993-94: Sarvekshana, July-September 1996; 1999-00: “Employment and Unemployment Situation in India”, 1999-2000,<br />

Report No. 458,NSS 55th Round, NSSO, Government <strong>of</strong> India, May 2001 Sarvekshana.<br />

6 The National Sample Survey reports mainly three measures <strong>of</strong> unemployment. According to the Usual Principal Status (UPS),<br />

the reference period is 365 days preceding the date <strong>of</strong> survey. If a person is unemployment for a major period, he/she is<br />

unemployed by UPS. Another measure is based on Current Weekly Status (CWS). As per this measure, if a person did not find<br />

work even for one hour in any day previous to the seven-day period, he/she is unemployed. The third measure is based on<br />

Current Daily Status (CDS) wherein each day <strong>of</strong> the previous seven days is classified as working or not working based on one<br />

to four hours as half day and more than four hours as full day.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!