Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 6<br />
RECKONING PROMISE: KERALA’S EDUCATIONAL CAPABILITY<br />
93<br />
huge capitation fees and very high tuition fees drew<br />
increasing numbers <strong>of</strong> takers from <strong>Kerala</strong>. Soon,<br />
there was a strong plea for the sanction <strong>of</strong> capitation<br />
fee colleges in <strong>Kerala</strong>. The Left ideology generated a<br />
strong aversion to commercialisation <strong>of</strong> education in<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong>, which, however, mellowed over time. This was<br />
even as the Government was unable to expand the<br />
public/aided sector in keeping with the growing demand<br />
for engineering seats.<br />
4.2.2 Controlled Expansion<br />
The Government started a few engineering colleges in<br />
the public domain in the latter half <strong>of</strong> the 1980s. One <strong>of</strong><br />
this was started in 1989 under a Government-sponsored<br />
autonomous body, viz., the Institute for Human Resources<br />
Development in Electronics (IHRDE). This college<br />
charged a higher tuition fee than what was applicable<br />
to the Government / aided colleges. The success <strong>of</strong> this<br />
institution emboldened the setting up <strong>of</strong> some more fullfledged<br />
self-financing colleges by Government-sponsored<br />
autonomous bodies; along with which one self-financing<br />
engineering college was allowed to be set up by the<br />
Muslim Educational Society, as a minority educational<br />
institution. During the same year, some self-financing<br />
courses were also started in a university. Thus, the total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> technical education institutions in <strong>Kerala</strong><br />
rose dramatically, with an intake <strong>of</strong> over 4,000 students<br />
and the self-financing mode appeared to have been<br />
accepted. A Supreme Court judgement, regarding the<br />
conduct <strong>of</strong> self-financing colleges was a landmark event<br />
in the history <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional education in the country.<br />
Capitation fees, as well as deposits, were abolished.<br />
A differential fee system (free seats and payment seats)<br />
was introduced in unaided colleges: 50 per cent free seats<br />
and 50 per cent payment seats. The ‘free’ seat holders<br />
(actually a misnomer) had to pay the same fees as that<br />
prevailing in Government colleges, while the ‘payment’<br />
seat holders had to pay sufficiently high fees so as to<br />
cover the rest <strong>of</strong> the recurring costs. Thus, the principle<br />
<strong>of</strong> self-financing, that educational institutions can be<br />
run solely by the fees and other charges collected from<br />
students, was granted legitimacy by the Supreme Court.<br />
The provision <strong>of</strong> free seats, while apparently addressing<br />
the concern for equity was not always so; rather those<br />
with higher paying capacity were to pay the expense <strong>of</strong><br />
one meritorious student who need not always be poor<br />
(George, 1995). Admission to all pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges<br />
was to be conducted by an authorised State agency, on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the rankings in a common entrance examination<br />
(CEE) to be conducted by the Government.<br />
The Government decided to entrust the task <strong>of</strong> managing<br />
self-financing pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges to public agencies, as<br />
far as possible. The State ministry <strong>of</strong> co-operation started a<br />
new agency for the sole purpose <strong>of</strong> operating self-financing<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges called Co-operative Academy <strong>of</strong><br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Education or CAPE, who were allotted a few<br />
engineering colleges. Finally, the Government itself came<br />
forward to start some more engineering colleges, belying the<br />
earlier argument that the State had no resources for starting<br />
new colleges. Thus, <strong>Kerala</strong> entered the new millennium with<br />
29 institutions under different sectors with an enrolment<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> nearly 8,000.<br />
4.2.3 The Explosion<br />
The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>’s policy decision in 2000 to<br />
grant ‘no objection certificates’ to any private agency that<br />
approached it for permission to start an unaided pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
college evoked a huge response. As the All India Council <strong>of</strong><br />
Technical Education (AICTE) was to take responsibility for<br />
approving the infrastructural facilities and the universities<br />
were to take care <strong>of</strong> the academic requirements, the<br />
Government, it was projected, had no role to play, except<br />
to facilitate private investment in pr<strong>of</strong>essional education.<br />
Thus, in 2004, <strong>Kerala</strong> had 88 institutions imparting<br />
technical education at the degree level, including 48 in the<br />
private unaided sector, with a total enrolment at 20,591.<br />
New branches were added. As much as 38 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
seats were in computer science or information technology;<br />
25 per cent were in electronics and related branches. The<br />
traditional branches, civil, mechanical and electrical (now<br />
converted into electrical and electronics) accounted for<br />
only 27 per cent <strong>of</strong> the seats. The remaining seats were<br />
in areas like biotechnology, biomedical engineering,