03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 6<br />

RECKONING PROMISE: KERALA’S EDUCATIONAL CAPABILITY<br />

93<br />

huge capitation fees and very high tuition fees drew<br />

increasing numbers <strong>of</strong> takers from <strong>Kerala</strong>. Soon,<br />

there was a strong plea for the sanction <strong>of</strong> capitation<br />

fee colleges in <strong>Kerala</strong>. The Left ideology generated a<br />

strong aversion to commercialisation <strong>of</strong> education in<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong>, which, however, mellowed over time. This was<br />

even as the Government was unable to expand the<br />

public/aided sector in keeping with the growing demand<br />

for engineering seats.<br />

4.2.2 Controlled Expansion<br />

The Government started a few engineering colleges in<br />

the public domain in the latter half <strong>of</strong> the 1980s. One <strong>of</strong><br />

this was started in 1989 under a Government-sponsored<br />

autonomous body, viz., the Institute for Human Resources<br />

Development in Electronics (IHRDE). This college<br />

charged a higher tuition fee than what was applicable<br />

to the Government / aided colleges. The success <strong>of</strong> this<br />

institution emboldened the setting up <strong>of</strong> some more fullfledged<br />

self-financing colleges by Government-sponsored<br />

autonomous bodies; along with which one self-financing<br />

engineering college was allowed to be set up by the<br />

Muslim Educational Society, as a minority educational<br />

institution. During the same year, some self-financing<br />

courses were also started in a university. Thus, the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> technical education institutions in <strong>Kerala</strong><br />

rose dramatically, with an intake <strong>of</strong> over 4,000 students<br />

and the self-financing mode appeared to have been<br />

accepted. A Supreme Court judgement, regarding the<br />

conduct <strong>of</strong> self-financing colleges was a landmark event<br />

in the history <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional education in the country.<br />

Capitation fees, as well as deposits, were abolished.<br />

A differential fee system (free seats and payment seats)<br />

was introduced in unaided colleges: 50 per cent free seats<br />

and 50 per cent payment seats. The ‘free’ seat holders<br />

(actually a misnomer) had to pay the same fees as that<br />

prevailing in Government colleges, while the ‘payment’<br />

seat holders had to pay sufficiently high fees so as to<br />

cover the rest <strong>of</strong> the recurring costs. Thus, the principle<br />

<strong>of</strong> self-financing, that educational institutions can be<br />

run solely by the fees and other charges collected from<br />

students, was granted legitimacy by the Supreme Court.<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> free seats, while apparently addressing<br />

the concern for equity was not always so; rather those<br />

with higher paying capacity were to pay the expense <strong>of</strong><br />

one meritorious student who need not always be poor<br />

(George, 1995). Admission to all pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges<br />

was to be conducted by an authorised State agency, on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> the rankings in a common entrance examination<br />

(CEE) to be conducted by the Government.<br />

The Government decided to entrust the task <strong>of</strong> managing<br />

self-financing pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges to public agencies, as<br />

far as possible. The State ministry <strong>of</strong> co-operation started a<br />

new agency for the sole purpose <strong>of</strong> operating self-financing<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges called Co-operative Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Education or CAPE, who were allotted a few<br />

engineering colleges. Finally, the Government itself came<br />

forward to start some more engineering colleges, belying the<br />

earlier argument that the State had no resources for starting<br />

new colleges. Thus, <strong>Kerala</strong> entered the new millennium with<br />

29 institutions under different sectors with an enrolment<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> nearly 8,000.<br />

4.2.3 The Explosion<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>’s policy decision in 2000 to<br />

grant ‘no objection certificates’ to any private agency that<br />

approached it for permission to start an unaided pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

college evoked a huge response. As the All India Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Technical Education (AICTE) was to take responsibility for<br />

approving the infrastructural facilities and the universities<br />

were to take care <strong>of</strong> the academic requirements, the<br />

Government, it was projected, had no role to play, except<br />

to facilitate private investment in pr<strong>of</strong>essional education.<br />

Thus, in 2004, <strong>Kerala</strong> had 88 institutions imparting<br />

technical education at the degree level, including 48 in the<br />

private unaided sector, with a total enrolment at 20,591.<br />

New branches were added. As much as 38 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

seats were in computer science or information technology;<br />

25 per cent were in electronics and related branches. The<br />

traditional branches, civil, mechanical and electrical (now<br />

converted into electrical and electronics) accounted for<br />

only 27 per cent <strong>of</strong> the seats. The remaining seats were<br />

in areas like biotechnology, biomedical engineering,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!