03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4<br />

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN KERALA: SPATIAL AND HORIZONTAL INEQUALITIES<br />

61<br />

indicated for Malappuram district, which is an outlier<br />

district and thus raises the variability, does not take<br />

into account the significant amount <strong>of</strong> remittances<br />

accruing to that district. More than 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total international migration from <strong>Kerala</strong> is accounted<br />

for by this district alone. Thus, it seems safe to assume<br />

only marginal inter-district variability in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

the income dimension. And, this strengthens our<br />

earlier argument that the overall situation is one <strong>of</strong> an<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> any significant disparity in human development<br />

between the 14 districts in <strong>Kerala</strong>. Viewed from an<br />

all-India context, this should be reckoned as a<br />

remarkable achievement.<br />

3. Gender-related Development Index<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong> is also ranked at the top in the gender-related<br />

development index (GDI) among major States in India.<br />

The lowest rank was observed in Bihar followed by<br />

Uttar Pradesh. Further, there has been substantial<br />

improvement in the GDI in <strong>Kerala</strong> in tandem with the<br />

HDI. The GDI was 0.697 in 1997 and increased to<br />

0.746 in 2001. Among the districts in <strong>Kerala</strong>,<br />

Alappuzha has been in the fourth position with respect<br />

to HDI; however, it ranked first position with respect<br />

to GDI. Ernakulam district secured second rank, while<br />

Malappuram district is ranked in the lowest position<br />

with respect to GDI. Kozhikode district was in the eighth<br />

position in HDI, however, it is pushed to thirteenth<br />

position in respect <strong>of</strong> GDI. Analogous to HDI, the<br />

disparity among the districts seems to be insignificant<br />

with respect to GDI as well. The coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation<br />

in the GDI is only 3 per cent and it ranges between<br />

3-12 per cent among the GDI component dimensions.<br />

Table 4.2: District-wise Gender-related Development Index (GDI), 2001<br />

Districts Equally Distributed Index for GDI Rank<br />

Income Health Education GDI<br />

Thiruvananthapuram 0.486 0.835 0.910 0.743 9<br />

Kollam 0.495 0.867 0.930 0.764 6<br />

Pathanamthitta 0.478 0.859 0.957 0.765 5<br />

Alappuzha 0.518 0.867 0.947 0.777 1<br />

Kottayam 0.490 0.842 0.963 0.765 4<br />

Idukki 0.559 0.790 0.877 0.742 11<br />

Ernakulam 0.525 0.848 0.953 0.775 2<br />

Thrissur 0.493 0.856 0.950 0.766 3<br />

Palakkad 0.487 0.850 0.892 0.743 10<br />

Malappuram 0.313 0.841 0.913 0.689 14<br />

Kozhikode 0.406 0.838 0.945 0.730 13<br />

Wayanad 0.514 0.810 0.886 0.736 12<br />

Kannur 0.472 0.843 0.951 0.755 7<br />

Kasaragod 0.509 0.844 0.879 0.744 8<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong> 0.483 0.825 0.930 0.746<br />

Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variation (%) 12.3 2.5 3.4 3.0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!