Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
66<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> households with more than one hectare<br />
declining over time. Landlessness is higher among the SCs<br />
than STs as also the ‘others’ (Nair and Menon, Ibid).<br />
Both the Central and State Governments have made<br />
various efforts to protect and promote the land rights <strong>of</strong><br />
the SC and ST population. Yet, the outcome is far from<br />
satisfactory, given the requirement <strong>of</strong> these households,<br />
largely dependent on land. The surplus land declared<br />
in <strong>Kerala</strong> as part <strong>of</strong> land reforms was itself low at only<br />
1.35 lakh acres. Out <strong>of</strong> this 47 per cent <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
was distributed among vulnerable sections as on March<br />
1996. It has benefited nearly 43 per cent <strong>of</strong> the SCs and<br />
5 per cent <strong>of</strong> the ST population. The average size <strong>of</strong><br />
land made available to the SCs was only 41 cents; and<br />
for STs, it was 71 cents. As per the national guidelines,<br />
50 per cent <strong>of</strong> the surplus land declared is to be<br />
distributed among the SCs and STs. While the all-India<br />
situation meets this stipulation, <strong>Kerala</strong> lags behind with<br />
only 47 per cent <strong>of</strong> the area declared surplus having<br />
been made available to Scheduled Castes and Tribes thus<br />
far. Hence, the achievement on this front lags behind<br />
expectations, which has led to the recent struggles<br />
for land rights in <strong>Kerala</strong> by adivasi organisations<br />
(Ravi Raman, 2003).<br />
5.5 Education<br />
What gets obscured by the very high aggregate levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> literacy in the State are the horizontal disparities<br />
Table 4.7: Level <strong>of</strong> Education among Social Groups, 1999-2000 (Rural)<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> Education ST SC OBC Others<br />
Illiterate 26.36 23.60 17.36 11.67<br />
Literate Without Formal Schooling 0.33 1.80 0.93 0.86<br />
Below Primary 16.12 17.05 18.31 12.30<br />
Primary 12.50 20.99 19.76 14.93<br />
Middle 26.32 25.67 27.52 26.00<br />
Secondary 8.22 7.49 10.72 19.50<br />
Higher Secondary 5.26 1.67 3.20 7.44<br />
Graduation above 4.90 1.73 3.20 7.30<br />
Source: Nair and Menon (2006, forthcoming).<br />
Table 4.8: Literacy Rate by Social Groups, 1991 Census<br />
Non-SC/ST Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe<br />
Districts Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total<br />
Thiruvananthapuram 94 87 90 87 78 82 82 67 74<br />
Kollam 95 89 92 85 74 80 69 56 62<br />
Pathanamthitta 98 95 96 90 83 86 76 71 73<br />
Alappuzha 97 92 94 94 85 89 80 69 74<br />
Kottayam 98 95 96 94 87 90 90 87 89<br />
Idukki 94 88 91 81 64 73 68 57 63<br />
Ernakulam 96 90 93 87 78 82 81 72 77<br />
Thrissur 95 89 92 84 74 79 55 48 51<br />
Palakkad 91 80 85 75 60 67 40 29 35<br />
Malappuram 93 85 89 85 74 79 50 38 44<br />
Kozhikode 96 87 92 91 81 86 57 48 52<br />
Wayanad 94 86 90 82 69 75 58 43 51<br />
Kannur 96 88 92 90 80 85 65 52 59<br />
Kasaragod 91 78 85 70 57 64 75 58 66<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong> 95 88 91 85 74 80 63 51 57<br />
Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variation (%) 3.5 6.5 5.0 7.6 11.9 9.5 20.1 26.1 22.7<br />
Source: Census <strong>of</strong> India, 1991.