Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40<br />
average. There were about 78 telephone connections in<br />
every sq. km area <strong>of</strong> the State in 2002-03. District-wise<br />
variations throw up a surprising result – low connectivity<br />
in Malappuram district which has the highest incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
migration (Table 2.15).<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong> has had an edge over all-India in the number <strong>of</strong> post<br />
<strong>of</strong>fices also. A number <strong>of</strong> favourable demand factors were<br />
at work behind the fast spread <strong>of</strong> post <strong>of</strong>fices in <strong>Kerala</strong>,<br />
including emigration <strong>of</strong> Keralites to other parts <strong>of</strong> India<br />
and abroad, literary movements and spread <strong>of</strong> print media.<br />
It is significant to note that out <strong>of</strong> the 5,077 post <strong>of</strong>fices<br />
in <strong>Kerala</strong> at present, as many as 4,197 are in rural areas.<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong> stands far above the all-India average, with 13 post<br />
<strong>of</strong>fices per 100 sq. km <strong>of</strong> area. That is, every 7.7 sq. km <strong>of</strong><br />
area in <strong>Kerala</strong> is now served by a post <strong>of</strong>fice, whereas it is<br />
21 sq. km <strong>of</strong> area for one post <strong>of</strong>fice all-India. Along with<br />
this higher level <strong>of</strong> availability is an equally higher access<br />
level. On an average, one post <strong>of</strong>fice in <strong>Kerala</strong> serves<br />
6,271 persons in an area <strong>of</strong> 7.7 sq. km against 6,568 persons<br />
in an area <strong>of</strong> 21 sq. km for all-India.<br />
5. Concluding Observations<br />
This chapter has mainly confirmed what is well-known<br />
about <strong>Kerala</strong>’s development experience in certain nonincome<br />
dimensions <strong>of</strong> human well-being. Additionally,<br />
gender, rural-urban and inter-district disparities in<br />
the levels <strong>of</strong> achieved functionings display a pleasing<br />
divergence from the picture <strong>of</strong> group inequity, which<br />
obtains for much <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the country; however,<br />
there are certain input indicators which display spatial<br />
inequalities. It must be stressed that not only must the<br />
achievements <strong>of</strong> human development be maintained at<br />
their current high levels, but additional preparedness<br />
should be forthcoming in order to tackle high levels <strong>of</strong><br />
morbidity, undernourished children and the enhanced<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> dependency ratios caused by the trend <strong>of</strong><br />
increasing life expectancy in the State. Resources must<br />
be found to maintain existing achievements and to meet<br />
emerging needs: The importance <strong>of</strong> raising incomes and<br />
alleviating income-related poverty cannot, therefore, be<br />
exaggerated. The next chapter addresses these issues.