03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44<br />

2. Growth Pattern <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kerala</strong> Economy<br />

2.1 Two Phases <strong>of</strong> Growth<br />

The long-term growth analysis <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kerala</strong> economy<br />

reveals two distinct phases in its economic development.<br />

A graphical analysis <strong>of</strong> the path <strong>of</strong> the Net State Domestic<br />

Product (NSDP) since 1970-71 at constant prices shows<br />

a significant turnaround in the trend around 1987-88<br />

not only <strong>of</strong> the aggregate NSDP (Figure 3.1) but also<br />

<strong>of</strong> the three broad sectors. The first phase, i.e. prior<br />

to 1987, is characterised by near stagnation <strong>of</strong> major<br />

economic indicators and the next, the post-1987 phase<br />

by significant growth. It should be noted that despite<br />

stagnation, human development, in terms <strong>of</strong> education<br />

and health indicators, continued to improve during the<br />

first period.<br />

2.2 From Stagnation to Revival<br />

A comparative picture <strong>of</strong> Net Domestic Product<br />

(NDP) for <strong>Kerala</strong> and all-India for the two time periods<br />

reveals that annual growth rate <strong>of</strong> NSDP <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong><br />

increased from 1.9 per cent to 5.8 per cent over this<br />

time span. It is also interesting to note that the growth<br />

rate, which was nearly half the all-India figure in the<br />

first period, caught up with it at almost the same level in<br />

the second period. These figures suggest that the <strong>Kerala</strong><br />

economy has gradually emerged out <strong>of</strong> the situation<br />

<strong>of</strong> high social sector development with low economic<br />

growth. In fact, the late 1980s witnessed a slight<br />

improvement in growth performance, but evidently<br />

not enough to recover from the slow growth syndrome.<br />

It can thus be considered that the 1990s constituted<br />

a phase <strong>of</strong> growth momentum <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kerala</strong> economy<br />

(Table 3.1).<br />

Table 3.1: Sectoral Growth Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Net State Domestic Product (1993-94 Prices)<br />

Sector <strong>Kerala</strong> All India<br />

Period 1 Period 2 Period 1 Period 2<br />

Primary Sector -0.14 2.90 2.69 3.47<br />

Secondary Sector 2.38 6.13 5.02 6.53<br />

Tertiary Sector 3.28 7.55 5.19 7.48<br />

Aggregate 1.89 5.79 4.08 5.98<br />

Per capita<br />

SDP/GDP<br />

0.52 5.03 1.87 4.01<br />

Note: Period 1 = 1970-71 to 1986-87 and Period 2 = 1987-88 to 2002-03.<br />

Source: Estimated from CSO, National Accounts Statistics, different issues.<br />

2.3 Per Capita SDP<br />

During the stagnation phase, <strong>Kerala</strong>’s average annual<br />

growth rate <strong>of</strong> NSDP was too low to cover even the<br />

population growth rate, while at the all-India level,<br />

it was 1.53 per cent above the population growth rate.<br />

What is significant is that the <strong>Kerala</strong> economy overtook<br />

the all-India per capita SDP growth rate during<br />

the second phase. It may be noted here that this<br />

growth in per capita income in effect also represents<br />

a complementary effect <strong>of</strong> human development<br />

through the demographic transition; it is the drastic<br />

fall in population growth rate that partly explains the<br />

significant rise in per capita income.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!