03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4<br />

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN KERALA: SPATIAL AND HORIZONTAL INEQUALITIES<br />

65<br />

Table 4.6: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Households by Social Groups and Household Type, 1999-2000 (Rural)<br />

Social Groups/ Self-employed in Agricultural Other Labour Self-employed Others Total<br />

Household Type Non-agriculture Labour<br />

in Agriculture<br />

Scheduled Tribe 10.71 33.92 12.50 23.21 19.64 100<br />

Scheduled Caste 4.72 55.79 26.60 3.43 9.01 100<br />

Other Backward Classes 22.81 16.86 25.35 17.71 17.01 100<br />

Others 18.36 19.32 21.32 20.36 20.43 100<br />

Source: Nair and Menon (2006, forthcoming).<br />

The decline in poverty among SCs and STs could be broadly<br />

attributed to the increase in wages <strong>of</strong> rural labourers, a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> anti-poverty measures undertaken by both the<br />

Central and State Governments, and to the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

general economy, which, in turn, raises the average level<br />

<strong>of</strong> income. However, what is still a matter <strong>of</strong> concern is the<br />

over-representation <strong>of</strong> both SCs and STs in the population<br />

below the poverty line in the State.<br />

It has been argued (Chapter 3) that a major contributory<br />

factor to poverty reduction in <strong>Kerala</strong> was the growth in<br />

urbanisation and its positive correlation with non-agricultural<br />

output/employment; there might be some connection<br />

between urbanisation and reduction in income poverty<br />

through the non-farm income route. Perhaps, a clue as to<br />

why SCs and STs have not benefited from a more equitable<br />

provisioning <strong>of</strong> social services lies in the lower diversification<br />

<strong>of</strong> these groups into non-agricultural activities, the proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> which is higher in the more urbanised districts (Narayana<br />

2003). In <strong>Kerala</strong>, the dependence <strong>of</strong> the SC/ST population<br />

on agriculture is much higher than the general population<br />

(Table 4.6). 4 Although the overall proportion <strong>of</strong> main workers<br />

in the non-primary sector among the SCs is about 17 per cent<br />

lower compared to the general population, the proportion is<br />

close to 50 per cent in the most urbanised districts (Narayana<br />

ibid.). This is not so for the ST population; the proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> which in the non-primary sector is low, irrespective <strong>of</strong><br />

the district they belong to. Further, the district with a large<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> STs (Wayanad) is the least urbanised and<br />

has shown practically no growth in this respect. The lower<br />

economic diversification, which also impacts on level <strong>of</strong><br />

wages earned in agriculture, does get translated into poorer<br />

material conditions <strong>of</strong> life and in turn constrains access to<br />

basic social amenities, whether it is housing, electricity<br />

lighting, good sanitation and drinking water. 5<br />

This is reflected in a much higher index <strong>of</strong> deprivation for<br />

SCs and STs as shown in Table 4.3; it is higher by 70 and<br />

115 per cent, respectively, as compared to other caste and<br />

community groups in the State. The STs in Wayanad district<br />

are the most deprived social group, followed by the STs in<br />

Idukki and Palakkad, and among the SCs, the most deprived<br />

are in Kasaragod district. As expected, in all districts, ‘other’<br />

caste groups are the least deprived. Interestingly, the disparity<br />

in deprivation does not exist between SCs and other caste<br />

groups in Idukki and it is low in Wayanad.<br />

This situation gets further aggravated by landlessness/small<br />

sized holdings among the SC and ST households in the<br />

State, which is still a crucial developmental issue. 6<br />

5.4 Landholding<br />

The average size <strong>of</strong> landholding among the STs is 0.68 acres,<br />

which is higher than that for the SCs (0.32 acres), OBCs<br />

(0.40 acres) and others (0.63 acres) (Nair and Menon 2006,<br />

forthcoming). Though the average size <strong>of</strong> land ownership is<br />

higher among the STs, given the historical experiences <strong>of</strong> land<br />

encroachment, acquisition <strong>of</strong> forest land by the Government<br />

and tribal displacement, the STs remain vulnerable, the<br />

4 It is also higher than the proportion in many other States.<br />

5 Kannan and Hari (2002).<br />

6 For detailed accounts, see K. Ravi Raman (2003). “Breaking New Ground: Adivasi Land Struggle in <strong>Kerala</strong>”, Economic and<br />

Political Weekly, March 9; Bijoy, C.R. and K. Ravi Raman (2003). “Muthanga: The Real Story: Adivasi Movement to Recover<br />

Land”, Economic and Political Weekly, May 17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!