03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62<br />

4. Generalised Deprivation<br />

It is also interesting to see the disparity among districts in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty in <strong>Kerala</strong>. However, it<br />

is not possible to discuss the incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty at the<br />

district level, since a more desirable approach would be to<br />

examine the incidence <strong>of</strong> deprivation that is not based on<br />

household consumer expenditure. Owing to unavoidable<br />

constraints <strong>of</strong> data availability, therefore, we have had to<br />

resort to assessing deprivation at the disaggregated level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the district in non-income terms. Accordingly, we<br />

have constructed an index <strong>of</strong> (generalised, non-income)<br />

deprivation for all districts in <strong>Kerala</strong>. The index <strong>of</strong> deprivation<br />

is based on deprivation in four basic necessities for<br />

well-being, such as housing quality, access to drinking<br />

water, good sanitation and electricity lighting (see<br />

Technical Note to this Report on the methodology). Data<br />

from the 2001 Census has been used for constructing such<br />

a deprivation index. Deprivation in these commodities can<br />

have a deleterious impact on human development and the<br />

well-being <strong>of</strong> the people.<br />

Table 4.3 shows this index <strong>of</strong> deprivation for <strong>Kerala</strong> by<br />

districts in 2001 (and across social groups to be discussed<br />

in the next section). The incidence <strong>of</strong> deprivation is<br />

about 30 per cent in <strong>Kerala</strong>, within a range <strong>of</strong> 15.5 (for<br />

Ernakulam district) and 46.3 (for Wayanad district), which<br />

is significantly above the <strong>of</strong>ficial head count index <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty. Wayanad, Idukki and Palakkad districts have<br />

the highest deprivation indices <strong>of</strong> above 40 per cent.<br />

Thiruvananthapuram, Kasaragod, Pathanamthitta and<br />

Kollam districts lie below this group, with deprivation<br />

indices <strong>of</strong> 30-40 per cent. Ernakulam district is the<br />

only outlier, with the least deprivation <strong>of</strong> less than<br />

20 per cent. Map 4.1 shows the spatial disparity in the<br />

index <strong>of</strong> deprivation in <strong>Kerala</strong>. It appears, therefore, that<br />

though there is no significant disparity with respect to HDI<br />

and GDI, significant variation is found in the generalised<br />

Table 4.3: District-wise Index <strong>of</strong> Deprivation by Social Groups, 2001<br />

Districts SC Rank ST Rank Others Rank All Rank<br />

Thiruvananthapuram 54.4 13 60.1 10 37.0 11 39.5 11<br />

Kollam 47.8 8 50.7 5 27.7 7 30.4 8<br />

Pathanamthitta 50.3 10 54.6 7 27.8 8 31.1 9<br />

Alappuzha 45.9 6 40.1 3 27.7 6 29.6 6<br />

Kottayam 42.1 4 43.1 4 23.1 3 25.1 3<br />

Idukki 40.8 2 65.3 13 40.9 13 42.7 13<br />

Ernakulam 29.3 1 37.2 1 14.0 1 15.5 1<br />

Thrissur 42.0 3 37.5 2 21.9 2 24.7 2<br />

Palakkad 52.9 12 65.3 12 37.1 12 40.4 12<br />

Malappuram 46.2 7 56.8 8 26.5 4 28.6 5<br />

Kozhikode 48.8 9 50.9 6 26.6 5 28.3 4<br />

Wayanad 51.5 11 66.0 14 41.6 14 46.3 14<br />

Kannur 43.8 5 57.7 9 28.7 9 29.7 7<br />

Kasaragod 62.7 14 61.3 11 34.1 10 37.6 10<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong> 45.5 57.9 26.9 29.5<br />

Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variation (%) 16.5 19.4 26.1 25.8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!