03.02.2014 Views

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3<br />

ASSESSING DEVELOPMENT: THE INCOME DIMENSION<br />

45<br />

It can be seen from Figure 3.2 that the per capita NSDP<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>, which had been consistently below that <strong>of</strong><br />

all-India, increased at a much faster rate in the 1990s.<br />

Since 1993-94 onwards, the <strong>Kerala</strong> economy has been<br />

performing much better than all-India in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

per capita NSDP. It should be noted that these<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> NSDP and per capita NSDP are devoid <strong>of</strong><br />

the remittance income <strong>of</strong> non-resident Keralites and if<br />

we consider the remittances, <strong>Kerala</strong>'s 'modified' NSDP<br />

and 'modified' per capita NSDP 1 would come out much<br />

higher than the <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates.<br />

2.4 Remittance Incomes<br />

It should be noted that the <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates <strong>of</strong> NSDP<br />

and per capita NSDP are devoid <strong>of</strong> the remittance<br />

income <strong>of</strong> non-resident Keralites. It is reported that in<br />

1998, there were 13.62 lakh <strong>Kerala</strong> emigrants living<br />

abroad. Emigration from <strong>Kerala</strong> accelerated in recent<br />

years; between 1988-1992 and 1993-1997, the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> emigrants increased by 120 per cent. 2 Remittance<br />

income data are available only for the country as a<br />

whole and not for the constituent States; hence, the<br />

remittances are not counted in the calculation <strong>of</strong><br />

NSDP, which in effect does not reflect the actual level<br />

<strong>of</strong> income the State receives. A number <strong>of</strong> attempts<br />

have been made to estimate remittances for <strong>Kerala</strong>, for<br />

example, by attributing a certain share according to<br />

<strong>Kerala</strong>’s share <strong>of</strong> Indian workers abroad, 3 or indirectly<br />

estimating it by means <strong>of</strong> a proxy variable like per<br />

capita bank deposits. 4 An estimate <strong>of</strong> the total cash<br />

remittances received by <strong>Kerala</strong> households (as during<br />

a 12-month period) in 1998 comes to the tune <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 35,304 million. The average remittance was about<br />

Rs. 25,000 per emigrant, (Rs.5,500 per household<br />

and Rs. 1,105 per capita). The annual remittances<br />

received by <strong>Kerala</strong> households were 2.55 times higher<br />

than what the <strong>Kerala</strong> Government received from<br />

the Central Government by way <strong>of</strong> budget support.<br />

It was more than the export earnings from the<br />

State’s seafood industries (about Rs.10,000 million)<br />

or export earnings from the State’s spices industry<br />

(Rs.5,700 million). Besides cash, households received<br />

several items in kind – clothing, ornaments and jewellery,<br />

and electric and electronic gadgets; the estimated total<br />

value <strong>of</strong> goods received in that year comes to about<br />

Rs.5,413 million. Total remittances thus estimated<br />

(cash plus goods) amounts to Rs.40,717 million or<br />

10.7 per cent <strong>of</strong> SDP in 1998.<br />

However, reliable estimates <strong>of</strong> the quantum <strong>of</strong> remittances<br />

over time are difficult to obtain. A recent study at CDS 5<br />

has estimated, with somewhat better informational<br />

base, a time series <strong>of</strong> remittances to <strong>Kerala</strong> (using<br />

the first method) for a period <strong>of</strong> about three decades<br />

beginning from the early 1970s. These estimates show<br />

1 To be explained in the next Section.<br />

2 Zachariah et al (2002).<br />

3 See Gulati and Modi (1983).<br />

4 See Krishnan (1994).<br />

5 Kannan and Hari (2002).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!