Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
Kerala 2005 - of Planning Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
104<br />
secretarial practice and data preparation – during the<br />
same period (Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerala</strong>, 2001). 4<br />
2.3 Quality <strong>of</strong> Employment<br />
At a basic level, as dictated by data availability,<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> employment is examined in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
‘casual employment’, ‘self-employment’ and ‘regular<br />
employment’. The evidence presented in Table 7.5<br />
indicates a higher level <strong>of</strong> regular employment for<br />
rural men and women in <strong>Kerala</strong> compared to all-India<br />
levels. The urban women in <strong>Kerala</strong> also compare well<br />
with all India. The tendency during the 1990s is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> significant increase for rural women followed by<br />
marginal increase for rural men and urban women.<br />
However, there is a decline for urban men.<br />
Self-employment is a mixed category and hence need<br />
not necessarily be an indication <strong>of</strong> higher quality <strong>of</strong><br />
employment than casual labour. In the Indian context,<br />
it may not be far <strong>of</strong>f the mark to say that a considerable<br />
section <strong>of</strong> the self-employed are usually the labouring<br />
poor and this might hold good for <strong>Kerala</strong> too<br />
(see Section 1.6).<br />
The greater incidence <strong>of</strong> casual employment among<br />
men in <strong>Kerala</strong> is in contrast to the all-India situation.<br />
However, both in <strong>Kerala</strong> and at the all-India level,<br />
there is a higher incidence <strong>of</strong> casual employment in<br />
rural areas than in urban areas. The quality <strong>of</strong> casual<br />
employment is reckoned to be higher in <strong>Kerala</strong> given<br />
higher wage rate, a high degree <strong>of</strong> unionisation leading<br />
to stable working hours, and non-wage benefits through<br />
such collective care arrangements as welfare funds and<br />
other social security measures (Kannan 1992, 2001<br />
and 2002). These factors could be attracting more men<br />
than women.<br />
2.4 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Employed<br />
The nature <strong>of</strong> employment in terms <strong>of</strong> regularity and<br />
security is expected to be an important issue for the<br />
educated. In general, a quarter <strong>of</strong> the educated employed<br />
in the 2003 survey reported being self-employed and<br />
around 16 per cent were in casual employment, leaving<br />
around 60 per cent in regular/permanent employment.<br />
Regular employment denoted continuity <strong>of</strong> employment<br />
but no security whereas permanence denoted security<br />
as well.<br />
In general, the educated prefer salaried employment<br />
as denoted by regular/permanent employment<br />
followed by self-employment. An overwhelming<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> women reported regular/permanent<br />
employment (82 per cent), with 11 per cent being<br />
in self-employment and only around 7 per cent<br />
in casual employment as opposed to 51, 19 and<br />
30 per cent, respectively, for men (Table 7.6). In<br />
this context, it is not surprising to find that a higher<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> women is employed in the public sector<br />
(45 per cent) than men (34 per cent). Education<br />
is associated with greater access to employment<br />
in the public/private sectors. Higher educational<br />
qualifications went alongside higher employment<br />
Table 7.5: Employment by Status, National Sample Survey Organisation<br />
Self Employment Regular Employment Casual Employment<br />
1987-88 1993-94 1999-00 1987-88 1993-94 1999-00 1987-88 1993-94 1999-00<br />
<strong>Kerala</strong><br />
Rural Male 44.6 40.8 38.1 12.2 12.3 13.0 43.2 46.9 48.9<br />
Rural Female 57.7 55.0 53.0 9.4 9.7 15.0 32.9 35.3 32.0<br />
Urban Male 41.0 37.5 37.4 32.6 26.8 28.0 26.4 35.7 34.6<br />
Urban Female 51.5 45.8 50.9 30.9 26.6 31.9 17.6 27.6 17.2<br />
All-India<br />
Rural Male 58.6 57.7 55.0 10.0 8.5 8.8 31.4 33.8 36.2<br />
Rural Female 60.8 58.6 57.3 3.7 2.7 3.1 35.5 38.7 39.6<br />
Urban Male 41.7 41.7 41.5 43.7 42.2 41.7 14.6 16.1 16.8<br />
Urban Female 47.1 44.8 45.3 27.5 29.2 33.3 25.4 26.0 21.4<br />
Source: 1987-88: Sarvekshana, September 1990; 1993-94: Sarvekshana, July-September 1996; 1999-00: “Employment and Unemployment Situation in India”, 1999-2000,<br />
Report No. 458,NSS 55th Round, NSSO, Government <strong>of</strong> India, May 2001 Sarvekshana.<br />
4 For more details and analysis see Eapen and Kodoth (2003).