20.10.2014 Views

GEO Brasil - UNEP

GEO Brasil - UNEP

GEO Brasil - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the state of the environment in Brazil<br />

Table 3 - Evolution of the incidence rate of dengue cases registered in<br />

Brazil, per region, in the 1980s and 1990s (per 100,000 hab.).<br />

Regions 1980/84 1985/89 1990/94 1995/99<br />

North 152.68 0 21.56 607.63<br />

Northeast 0 117.34 174.74 1661.84<br />

Southeast 0 161.73 187.82 618.07<br />

South 0 0 0 56.38<br />

Central West 0 0 155.49 820.17<br />

Source: MS/FUNASA - 2001<br />

Table 4 - Evolution of the incidence rate of malaria registered in Brazil,<br />

per region, in the 1980s and 1990s (per 100,000 inhabitants).<br />

Regions 1980/84 1985/89 1990/94 1995/99<br />

North 14406.2 23085.1 17943.8 19110.4<br />

Northeast 327.1 640.7 297.8 353.5<br />

Southeast 21.0 36.7 14.1 6.0<br />

South 3.9 80.3 41.9 10.0<br />

Central West 1242.7 1942.5 20650.0 22140.0<br />

Source: MS/FUNASA - 2001<br />

period Actually, this geographically unequal distribution relates to the<br />

particularities of these diseases’ dynamics More specifically, and in what concerns<br />

the vectors involved, they have entirely different biological characteristics and<br />

behavioural habits In the case of dengue, the environmental crisis in the regions<br />

that were most affected has allowed the proliferation and dispersion of its vector,<br />

Aedes aegypti, which has exclusively urban habits; while in the case of malaria, the<br />

disorganised occupation has been promoting the multiplication of its vector, Anopheles<br />

darlingi, which uses large collections of clear water as its main breeding sites<br />

Although there was an increase in the<br />

incidence of these diseases, there was<br />

also a greater capacity to recognise and<br />

register these illnesses due to an<br />

improved epidemiological surveillance<br />

system This improvement is the result<br />

of the decentralisation and extension<br />

of basic services, in addition to the<br />

dissemination of information through<br />

communication means, also<br />

contributing to a better comprehension<br />

of the scenario of communicable<br />

diseases in the country Nonetheless,<br />

it is alarming to note the prevalent<br />

medicalisation of health issues, where<br />

promoting health is still considered<br />

less important than taking care of<br />

complaints and agony<br />

In terms of communicable diseases,<br />

on the other hand, it should also be<br />

noted that there was a substantial<br />

reduction of diseases that can be<br />

controlled through precise actions, by<br />

means of immunisations (Table 5)<br />

The elimination of poliomyelitis<br />

transmission, the drastic reduction in<br />

the incidence of measles, tetanus –<br />

including neonatal - whooping cough,<br />

among others, were significant<br />

victories achieved by the Health<br />

System in recent years<br />

Table5-Timeevolution of some infectious diseases that are preventable by means of immunisation, registered<br />

in Brazil, in the 1980s and 1990s.<br />

Doença 1980/84 1985/89 subtotal 1990/94 1995/99 subtotal<br />

Whooping cough 188282 87172 275454 37222 9538 46760<br />

Diphtheria 18050 6675 24725 1908 623 2531<br />

Poliomyelitis 1656 1278 2934 0 0 0<br />

Human rabies 630 243 873 275 136 411<br />

Measles 338420 321026 659446 114560 5911 173671<br />

Accidental tetanus 6574 9538 16112 6644 4223 10867<br />

Neonatal tetanus 1892 2348 4240 1188 462 1650<br />

Source: MS/FUNASA - 2001<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!