GEO Brasil - UNEP
GEO Brasil - UNEP
GEO Brasil - UNEP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
environmental management<br />
Territorial practices that stimulate<br />
these tendencies are in a transitional<br />
phase. The results, are yet undefined<br />
in the long term. However they can<br />
be synthesised from two directions.<br />
On one side, there is an urbanindustrial<br />
spread, in almost all the<br />
biomes. On the other side, there is an<br />
increasing movement towards<br />
claiming new land for agriculture and<br />
cattle breeding. This is mainly due to<br />
considerable production increase and<br />
advances in both activities. These<br />
are the undefined issues of a<br />
transitional period. They make it<br />
difficult to construct reliable forecasts.<br />
However, they open up a wide range<br />
of opportunities for conscientious<br />
actions and institutional solutions.<br />
The constitutional reference represents the recognition of these spatial units for<br />
sustainable management purposes. The notion of national heritage, in contrast,<br />
has two functions from the point of view of time management: a synchronic<br />
function, in which it entails mobilisation of resources and strategic options for<br />
sustainable development, and a diachronic function, in which it refers to the<br />
attribution of future purposes.<br />
Thus, the spatial formations become fractions of the national territory that belong<br />
to a differentiated category, as they constitutionally imply three factors: safety,<br />
transmission and institutional character. The first factor, safety, encompasses<br />
conservation of intradiversity and physical-biotic interformations as a necessary<br />
condition to ensure the quality of the environment and the natural resources<br />
within it. The transmission factor, which is closely related to the term heritage,<br />
means that in the future there will be natural resources and the possibility to<br />
renovate the methods for their use for heritage to be shared by. The institutional<br />
factor creates the possibility for the responsibility of the federal, state and<br />
municipal powers. Therefore, the conventions and rules in that regard must<br />
regulate and stand for sustainable management.<br />
2. The Scope of<br />
InstitutionalResponses:<br />
the Desired Scenario<br />
The starting point for the desired<br />
scenario is the institutional changes<br />
that can provide for alterations in the<br />
previously identified tendencies. In<br />
this regard, such scenario seeks to<br />
incorporate the economic, social,<br />
environmental and spatial dimensions<br />
of sustainable development.<br />
2.1 Possibilities for<br />
Sustainable Management<br />
The federal constitution of 1988<br />
incorporated a specific chapter about<br />
the environment. The physical-biotic<br />
formations like the Amazon Forest,<br />
Atlantic Forest, Pantanal and Coastal<br />
Zone have constitutionally been<br />
granted the status of national heritage.<br />
As such, they must therefore be used<br />
according to the law providing that the<br />
conditions for preservation of the<br />
environment are fully met (Article 23,<br />
section VII and Article 225, first<br />
paragraph, section VII and second<br />
paragraph of the federal constitution).<br />
The alteration of the current tendencies requires deeper changes than the ones<br />
identified above. Structural reforms are all crucial to the attainment of that scenario.<br />
They change the highly concentrated income patterns, improve access to<br />
infrastructure of public goods and services, broaden the channels for participation<br />
of the civil society organisations, ensure that these organisations are legitimately<br />
represented and improve the rights for participation in management processes<br />
at local and regional levels.<br />
2.2 Institutional Feed Backs<br />
From an institutional perspective, the foundation of the Interministerial<br />
Committee for Sustainable Development (CIDES – Comitê Interministerial de<br />
Desenvolvimento Sustentável) was an important step towards improved coordination<br />
of policies, plans and sectorial and territorial programmes as well as<br />
tax and credit incentive programmes. The potential of the Committee lies in its<br />
capacity to co-ordinate information from different sectors, so as to harmonise<br />
guidelines, goals, objectives and actions in an integrated and structured manner.<br />
Additionally, insofar as its crosscutting institutional character is concerned, it<br />
reinforces actions aimed at responding to emergency situations: disasters,<br />
external events, etc.<br />
308