GEO Brasil - UNEP
GEO Brasil - UNEP
GEO Brasil - UNEP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
environmental management<br />
In order to make it possible for the environmental health<br />
policy of the Ministry of Health to be created and in order to<br />
create a solid co-ordination between the National Health<br />
Foundation (FUNASA - Fundação Nacional de Saúde) and<br />
other departments of the Ministry of Health that are<br />
developing actions and activities on environmental health,<br />
FUNASA submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Health to<br />
introduce a Permanent Commission for Environmental<br />
Health within the Ministry of Health. On December 11, 2001<br />
decision no. 2253/GM established the committee and its<br />
competencies. The committee is composed of FUNASA,<br />
the National Sanitation Monitoring Agency (ANVISA -<br />
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária), the Oswaldo Cruz<br />
Foundation (FIOCRUZ - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz),<br />
Secretariat for Health Policies of the Ministry of Health, the<br />
Executive Secretariat of the Ministry of Health and the<br />
Minister of Health’s Office.<br />
The Ministry of Health signed a technical co-operation<br />
agreement with the Ministry of the Environment aiming at<br />
developing policies and integrated actions for environmental<br />
health. It will catalyse initiatives to increase the institutional,<br />
political and socio-environmental impact of these actions.<br />
The co-operation agreement for Health and Environment,<br />
signed by the ministers of health and environment on<br />
November 7, 2001, aims to build an agenda for environmental<br />
health in the federal government in order to identify priority<br />
areas for co-operation that will be part of a pluriannual action<br />
plan. Besides the intraministerial co-ordination, the<br />
operation and structuring of SINVAS requires co-ordination<br />
of the Ministry of Health with other ministries, mainly the<br />
Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of Labour, Ministry<br />
of Foreign Relations, Ministry of Education and the Ministry<br />
of Planning, among other departments and agencies of the<br />
federal government (CGVAM, 2001). The structuring of<br />
environmental health monitoring within SUS has led to the<br />
development of sub-areas of action that will be gradually<br />
implemented focusing on mechanisms for monitoring<br />
health areas related to water use for human consumption,<br />
air, soil, contaminants, accidents with dangerous<br />
substances, natural disasters, vectors, reservoirs and<br />
poisoning of animals.<br />
SINVAS will participate through the National Council of<br />
Health (CNS – Conselho Nacional de Saúde), the National<br />
Council of the Environment (CONAMA – Conselho Nacional<br />
do Meio Ambiente) and other co-ordination mechanisms<br />
with society, private sector, non-governmental organisations<br />
(NGOs) and unions, among others.<br />
Still in the sanitation area, recently there have been<br />
significant breakthroughs in Brazilian cities (including the<br />
understanding of the concept of sanitation itself). It is worth<br />
mentioning that while the advances in sanitation of the<br />
1970s were above all of a technological nature directly related<br />
to constructions, today they are about alternative<br />
technological proposals and, mainly, innovative initiatives<br />
in service management. There is a strategy to rationalise<br />
the utilisation of federal resources for solid residues that<br />
has been reinforced under the Ministry of Environment and<br />
which has developed programmes and provided<br />
investments to solve the problems of garbage disposal.<br />
2.3. Challenges to Development Sustainability<br />
There had been few effective actions until the 1990s with a<br />
view to solving the fragmentation of policies. This was true<br />
for all types of policies, both environmental and other kinds.<br />
This occurred despite the identification and diagnosis of<br />
segmented policies during the last three decades as a<br />
relevant issue for the effective implementation of<br />
environmental policies. In fact, the diverse laws, agencies,<br />
plans and programmes and other mechanisms introduced<br />
during that period contributed only to increase<br />
segmentation. Nevertheless, this current trend is being<br />
overcome by the efforts toward strategic environmental<br />
management (Egler, P. C. 2002).<br />
Important responses from some sectors have already started<br />
to change the situation described above or, at least, to<br />
contribute to a change in the behaviour of some factors<br />
that cause impact. Hence, the responses of the public sector<br />
are based on the understanding of environment as a<br />
strategic element, whose actions are to be supported in<br />
previous negotiations in order to set guidelines that are<br />
operated on the medium and long term. In such a context<br />
of uncertainties, sustainable management take on a<br />
Strategic Environment Assessment, that is to say a process<br />
of environmental assessment on policy, plans and<br />
programmes on three different levels:<br />
a) sector plans and programmes assessment (e.g. energy<br />
and transport);<br />
b) plans and programmes assessment related to the use<br />
of territory, encompassing all activities to be<br />
implemented within a particular area; and<br />
310