20.10.2014 Views

GEO Brasil - UNEP

GEO Brasil - UNEP

GEO Brasil - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

environmental management<br />

In order to make it possible for the environmental health<br />

policy of the Ministry of Health to be created and in order to<br />

create a solid co-ordination between the National Health<br />

Foundation (FUNASA - Fundação Nacional de Saúde) and<br />

other departments of the Ministry of Health that are<br />

developing actions and activities on environmental health,<br />

FUNASA submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Health to<br />

introduce a Permanent Commission for Environmental<br />

Health within the Ministry of Health. On December 11, 2001<br />

decision no. 2253/GM established the committee and its<br />

competencies. The committee is composed of FUNASA,<br />

the National Sanitation Monitoring Agency (ANVISA -<br />

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária), the Oswaldo Cruz<br />

Foundation (FIOCRUZ - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz),<br />

Secretariat for Health Policies of the Ministry of Health, the<br />

Executive Secretariat of the Ministry of Health and the<br />

Minister of Health’s Office.<br />

The Ministry of Health signed a technical co-operation<br />

agreement with the Ministry of the Environment aiming at<br />

developing policies and integrated actions for environmental<br />

health. It will catalyse initiatives to increase the institutional,<br />

political and socio-environmental impact of these actions.<br />

The co-operation agreement for Health and Environment,<br />

signed by the ministers of health and environment on<br />

November 7, 2001, aims to build an agenda for environmental<br />

health in the federal government in order to identify priority<br />

areas for co-operation that will be part of a pluriannual action<br />

plan. Besides the intraministerial co-ordination, the<br />

operation and structuring of SINVAS requires co-ordination<br />

of the Ministry of Health with other ministries, mainly the<br />

Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of Labour, Ministry<br />

of Foreign Relations, Ministry of Education and the Ministry<br />

of Planning, among other departments and agencies of the<br />

federal government (CGVAM, 2001). The structuring of<br />

environmental health monitoring within SUS has led to the<br />

development of sub-areas of action that will be gradually<br />

implemented focusing on mechanisms for monitoring<br />

health areas related to water use for human consumption,<br />

air, soil, contaminants, accidents with dangerous<br />

substances, natural disasters, vectors, reservoirs and<br />

poisoning of animals.<br />

SINVAS will participate through the National Council of<br />

Health (CNS – Conselho Nacional de Saúde), the National<br />

Council of the Environment (CONAMA – Conselho Nacional<br />

do Meio Ambiente) and other co-ordination mechanisms<br />

with society, private sector, non-governmental organisations<br />

(NGOs) and unions, among others.<br />

Still in the sanitation area, recently there have been<br />

significant breakthroughs in Brazilian cities (including the<br />

understanding of the concept of sanitation itself). It is worth<br />

mentioning that while the advances in sanitation of the<br />

1970s were above all of a technological nature directly related<br />

to constructions, today they are about alternative<br />

technological proposals and, mainly, innovative initiatives<br />

in service management. There is a strategy to rationalise<br />

the utilisation of federal resources for solid residues that<br />

has been reinforced under the Ministry of Environment and<br />

which has developed programmes and provided<br />

investments to solve the problems of garbage disposal.<br />

2.3. Challenges to Development Sustainability<br />

There had been few effective actions until the 1990s with a<br />

view to solving the fragmentation of policies. This was true<br />

for all types of policies, both environmental and other kinds.<br />

This occurred despite the identification and diagnosis of<br />

segmented policies during the last three decades as a<br />

relevant issue for the effective implementation of<br />

environmental policies. In fact, the diverse laws, agencies,<br />

plans and programmes and other mechanisms introduced<br />

during that period contributed only to increase<br />

segmentation. Nevertheless, this current trend is being<br />

overcome by the efforts toward strategic environmental<br />

management (Egler, P. C. 2002).<br />

Important responses from some sectors have already started<br />

to change the situation described above or, at least, to<br />

contribute to a change in the behaviour of some factors<br />

that cause impact. Hence, the responses of the public sector<br />

are based on the understanding of environment as a<br />

strategic element, whose actions are to be supported in<br />

previous negotiations in order to set guidelines that are<br />

operated on the medium and long term. In such a context<br />

of uncertainties, sustainable management take on a<br />

Strategic Environment Assessment, that is to say a process<br />

of environmental assessment on policy, plans and<br />

programmes on three different levels:<br />

a) sector plans and programmes assessment (e.g. energy<br />

and transport);<br />

b) plans and programmes assessment related to the use<br />

of territory, encompassing all activities to be<br />

implemented within a particular area; and<br />

310

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!