20.10.2014 Views

GEO Brasil - UNEP

GEO Brasil - UNEP

GEO Brasil - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1. Biodiversity Responses<br />

policies feedback<br />

On September 28, 2001, the Brazilian Government<br />

established that provisional measure by means of<br />

a decree. On February 21, 2002 tne Government<br />

created the Generitc Resources Management<br />

Board through Decision no. 69. The board operates<br />

under the Ministry of the Environment and recieves<br />

inputs from several government agencies. The<br />

Over the ten years that have elapsed since the United Nations Conference on<br />

Environment and Development took place in 1992, there have been noticeable<br />

advances in the knowledge base of Brazilian diversity. From 1992 to 1997, initiatives<br />

to identify and catalogue existing species were carried out both at local and<br />

national levels. Some of these were spontaneous, such as scientific meetings<br />

(Bicudo & Menezes 1996) and the registration of specialists by scientific societies<br />

(SEB & SBE 1994). Others were promoted by NGOs or governmental organisations<br />

or sectors, several of which were created as a response to the Biological Diversity<br />

Convention. This happened either at federal level (Probio) or at state level, with<br />

the Biodiversity programme of the State of São Paulo, for instance.<br />

Board´s goal is to regulate acess and uses the<br />

genetics resources. By establishing the Board, the<br />

Government ignored a draft law that was under<br />

consideration by the scientific community and by<br />

the Lower house of the National Congress in<br />

Brasília. The Deree of September 2001 goes into<br />

much detail to regulate the access to and<br />

availability of genetic resouces for scientific<br />

research purposes. Howver, its coverage of<br />

business access to genetic resources is quite poor.<br />

This became a responsability of the Board. The<br />

Government is still working on the regulation of<br />

the use of genetic resources in Brazil, but there is<br />

little hope that the measures adopted by the<br />

government will match the concerns of society and<br />

the scientific community. This are continues to be<br />

weak and poorly supported both from the technical<br />

and legal point of view.<br />

The World Conservation Union (WCU) recognises the need to preserve<br />

biodiversity on three levels: genetic diversity, species diversity, and ecosystem<br />

diversity. Genetic diversity is essential for species to endure because it allows for<br />

their adaptation to environmental change. This diversity is strategic to man in<br />

areas ranging from medicine to the production of food. The maintenance of<br />

genetic diversity is fundamental for long-term conservation of ecological<br />

communities. Several ecological processes, from the extinction of a species to<br />

the existence of highly diversified taxonomic groups, intimately depend on<br />

genetic diversification within and among species. This is what sustains biological<br />

diversity.<br />

Brazil has adopted a few strategies in the past 10 years for the protection of<br />

biodiversity on the three levels mentioned above. The ones presented here are<br />

the advances in legislation, planning, and programmes for the management of<br />

species and recovery of native vegetation.<br />

4.1.1. Advances in legislation<br />

The accelerated loss of biodiversity and the adoption of measures to protect it<br />

are connected to the creation of public policy and tools for intervention (Leitão<br />

et al. 2002). Among the existing policies and public tools for intervention, three<br />

are directly linked to the maintenance of native forest coverage and,<br />

consequently, to the in-situ conservation of biodiversity. These are the National<br />

System of Conservation Units – SNUC, the Forest Code, the National Forest<br />

programme – PNF, and the Environmental Crimes Law.<br />

Perhaps the area that has advanced the most is legislation, in the wake of of the<br />

Constitution of 1998. It deals specifically with the protection of biological diversity<br />

and genetic resourses in article 225. The most significant changes in legislation<br />

are described below:<br />

a) SNUC Law – National System of Conservation Units<br />

Law no. 9.985 of the 18th of July, 2000, which established the National<br />

System of Conservation Units – SNUC, was a major accomplishment<br />

for the environment in the country. The law organises and updates the<br />

238<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!