24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It has been found that G max applies to both the initial static monotonic loading and dynamic loading of<br />

geomaterials (Jardine, et aL, 1991). Moreover, since very small strains have not yet generated any<br />

excess porewater pressures, G max can be applied to both drained and undrained soil behavior. Once<br />

G max is known, the shear modulus reduction curve can be derived from the plastic index (PI) of the<br />

soils (Vucetic & Dobry, 1991). Given the shear modulus G, the corresponding Young's modulus E,<br />

Bulk modulus B ! , and constrained modulus M' can be derived from the Poisson's ratio v. <strong>The</strong> range of<br />

the value of Poisson's ratio v is from 0.1 to 0.2 at these strains.<br />

118<br />

0 0001 0 001<br />

Shear Strain<br />

Figure 3. Secant Shear Modulus Reduction<br />

for Monotonic & Cyclic Loading<br />

100 1000<br />

Sicar Wsve Velocity, V s (ins)<br />

Figure 4. Correlation for Unit Weight from<br />

Depth and V s (Mayne, 2001)<br />

<strong>The</strong> amplitude information of the collected shear waves can be used to analyze the material damping in<br />

terms of damping ratio (D s ) at small-strains. Stewart & Campanella (1993) suggested that the spectral<br />

ratio slope (SRS) method is the most reliable and consistent approach to obtain the damping ratio D s of<br />

a soil layer by the SCPTu, but it still requires verification on different soil types to fully validate the<br />

technique (Campanella, 1994). D s increases with the strain level, and the relationship between D s and<br />

shear strain y c has also been correlated with the PI (Vucetic & Dobry, 1991).<br />

LIQUEFACTION EVALUATION<br />

Recent earthquakes in Gujarat, India (2001), Izmit, Turkey (1999), Chi-Chi, Taiwan (1999) and Kobe,<br />

Japan (1995) have emphasized the importance of liquefaction hi geotechnical engineering because of<br />

its significant destructive nature. Liquefaction predominantly occurs in sands to silty sands that are<br />

difficult or impossible to sample. This warrants the use of field testing, especially the SCPTu, for<br />

liquefaction analysis, since the SCPTu provides not only the tip resistance qr and shear wave velocity<br />

V s , which can quantity the susceptibility to liquefaction (Robertson & Wride, 1998; Andrus & Stokoe,<br />

2000), but also obtains the sleeve friction f s and porewater pressure u 2 that are used for characterizing<br />

the soil types, layering, and geotechnical engineering parameters. Liquefaction notably occurs at depths<br />

less than 20 meters, and research found that the presence and thickness of the overlying clay cap<br />

significantly affects the liquefaction potential of underlying sand layers (Ishihara, 1985; Youd &<br />

Gams, 1995). Evaluating the liquefaction susceptibility of a certain soil layer and its potential for<br />

ground damage cannot therefore be confined to testing sandy soil samples only, but requires the<br />

characterization of its overlying capping clay layer as well

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!