24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

261<br />

3. GROUND SHAKING PREDICTIONS FOR HONG KONG<br />

Based on results presented in Lam et al (2002) and Chandler et al (2002b), Table 3 1 summarises the<br />

5% damped response spectrum predictions for design-level earthquakes affecting Hong Kong,<br />

comprising critical very far-field events (R=280km) <strong>The</strong> results have been based on CAM model for<br />

rock sites and FASA scaling model for soil sites<br />

TABLE 3.1<br />

RECOMMENDED PARAMETERS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR HONG KONG<br />

Return<br />

Period<br />

(years)<br />

PE<br />

750<br />

years<br />

Rock 1<br />

RSV max<br />

(mm/s)<br />

Rock 2<br />

RSD mx<br />

(mm)<br />

S-Factor<br />

for Soil<br />

RSV raax<br />

Soil 3<br />

RSV^<br />

(mm/s)<br />

S-Factor<br />

for Soil<br />

RSDan<br />

Soil 4<br />

RSDo^<br />

(mm)<br />

70<br />

500<br />

1000<br />

2500<br />

50%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

2%<br />

34<br />

70<br />

84<br />

100<br />

12<br />

25<br />

30<br />

36<br />

65<br />

57<br />

55<br />

54<br />

220<br />

400<br />

460<br />

540<br />

29<br />

26<br />

24<br />

24<br />

35<br />

64<br />

73<br />

86<br />

1 for periods T falling between CAM bedrock response spectrum comer periods TI and ^T 2 (refer Fig. 1.1)<br />

2 for periods T = 5 0 sec (Fig. 11)<br />

3 for penods T falling between TI and site period T s , TI = corner period on Soil RSV response spectrum (Fig 2 2)<br />

4 results correspond to period T = site period T s , values quoted are for T s = 1.0 sec and can be scaled in proportion to T 5><br />

provided T s < X m T 2 : X m = 1 - (M-5)/6 [Lam and Chandler (2002)]<br />

4. DRIFT PREDICTIONS FOR HONG KONG BUILDINGS<br />

In the recently established displacement-based approaches for seismic assessment of buildings, for<br />

example Priestley (1995), the overall drift demand at effective height of building (or at roof level) is<br />

compared with the corresponding drift capacity curve in order to assess the degree of damage as well<br />

as the factor of safety of the building This approach cannot however distinguish whether the drift is<br />

uniformly distributed at each storey or is concentrated at a particular storey that may be caused, for<br />

example, by the presence of a soft storey or by higher mode effects It is important to recognize that<br />

local deformation associated with high inter-storey drift would cause significant damage to the nonstructural<br />

(NS) components and high internal forces to develop in particular structural elements such as<br />

columns and coupling beams In this section, which starts with the estimation of overall lateral seismic<br />

drift demand, a prediction formula for maximum inter-storey drift demand of buildings with due<br />

consideration of higher mode effects and potential soft storey effects will be presented.<br />

<strong>The</strong> average building drift angle # a v g defined as the ratio between the roof seismic displacement and the<br />

height of building can be estimated by the equation [Chandler et al (2002b)]<br />

=165 RSD l<br />

(41)<br />

<strong>The</strong> maximum seismic inter-storey drift angle #max (due to the combined seismic vibration modes) can<br />

be related to the effective first-mode displacement RSD\ using the following generic expression:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!