24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

233<br />

g ^ w (4)<br />

Notice that the stability condition depends only on the natural frequency rather than the damping ratio of<br />

the structures. In order to achieve maximum damping effect in the PPF control, the natural frequency<br />

should be closely matched to that of the structure.<br />

2.2 Strain Rate Feedback Control<br />

Strain rate feedback control (SRF) is implemented by feeding the velocity co-ordinate to the compensator.<br />

<strong>The</strong> position co-ordinate of the compensator is then fed back with a negative gain to the structure. When a<br />

smart structure is involved using a collocated PZT actuator and sensor, this control is achieved by feeding<br />

the derivative of the voltage from the sensor, which is proportional to the strain rate, to the input of the<br />

compensator and applying the negative compensator output voltage to the actuator. <strong>The</strong> scalar equations<br />

governing the vibration of the structure in a single mode and the SRF controller are given as:<br />

-gQ} 2 7l (5)<br />

= a; t 2 f (6)<br />

<strong>The</strong> variables above are the same as those defined in the PPF control. <strong>The</strong> stability condition requires that<br />

the frequency in the second order compensator be greater than the controlled mode frequency of the<br />

structure. As compared with the PPF, SRF has a much wider active damping frequency region, which<br />

gives a designer some flexibility. Selecting a precise compensator frequency for SELF is not as critical as<br />

for PPF. As long as the compensator satisfies the stability condition, a certain amount of damping will be<br />

provided. SRF can also stabilize more than one mode given a sufficient bandwidth. A limitation of SRF is<br />

that the magnitude of the transfer function in the active damping region becomes extremely small very<br />

quickly. <strong>The</strong>refore, the amount of damping provided SRF over a certain frequency range is limited.<br />

2.3 Sliding-Mode Based Robust Controller<br />

Sliding mode controller (SMC) technique is naturally robust with respect to the uncertainty in the<br />

structural parameters and external disturbances. In principle, SMC consists of the control law that<br />

switches with infinite speed to drive the system on a specified state trajectory, called the sliding surface,<br />

and has capability to keep the state on this surface. Clearly, this controller belongs to the non-linear robust<br />

controller. Among the design issues, the most important is to design the sliding surface and reduce the<br />

chatter phenomenon. <strong>The</strong> governing equation of the structure is the same as described in equation (1). <strong>The</strong><br />

control force in the SMC framework is obtained by following the equivalent control method, which<br />

requires that the sliding surface r = £ + A£ and r = 0 , and the control force is called as the equivalent<br />

force. <strong>The</strong> parameter A is a positive constant. <strong>The</strong> control law can be expressed as<br />

u = -K D r~-pszt(ar) (7)<br />

where K D and r are positive constants. <strong>The</strong> parameter p called robust gain is maximum value of the<br />

nonlinear switching control action to account for the disturbance. And the sat function is a nonlinear<br />

saturation function imposing upper and lower bounds on a signal. <strong>The</strong> function is defined as<br />

Isgn(ar)<br />

otherwise<br />

(8)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!