24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

325<br />

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS<br />

Overview<br />

<strong>The</strong> STM has been incorporated in various major structural concrete codes. <strong>The</strong>se includes, among<br />

others, the Canadian Building Code (1984), CEB-FIP Model Code (1993), and AASHTO LRFD<br />

Bridge Design Specifications (1994). In 1998, a more detailed set of guidelines was published in a<br />

special report from the FIP (Federation Internationale de la Precontrainte) "Practical Design of<br />

Structural Concrete" (1998). Most recently, provisions have been developed to form Appendix A<br />

"Strut-and-Tie Models" to the ACI318-02 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete<br />

(2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> STM design provisions typically specify rules for arranging the strut-and-tie models, rules for<br />

defining the dimensions and ultimate stress limits of struts and nodes, requirements for the<br />

distribution and anchorage of ties, and requirements for crack control and ductility detailing<br />

(MacGregor 2002). However, the rules vary from one code to another because of uncertainties<br />

associated with defining the characteristics of an idealized truss within a continuum of structural<br />

concrete.<br />

ACI Appendix A<br />

As described in the previous section, the latest edition of ACI318-02 Building Code (2002) includes<br />

provisions for the STM as a design procedure for all forms of D-regions. Table 1 shows the<br />

summary of stress limits and strength reduction factors used in Appendix A. Fig. 3 illustrates the<br />

various struts defined in the code. More detailed information about ACI Appendix A as well as the<br />

comparison of the code with AASHTO LRFD (1994) is provided elsewhere (Kuchma and Tjhin,<br />

2001).<br />

Struts:<br />

/,„ = 0.85P,/,'<br />

Table 1 Stress Limits and Strength Reduction Factors<br />

Stress Limits<br />

where: P, =1.00 for prismatic struts in uncracked compression zones (Fig. 3: (d) and (f))<br />

(3^ = 0.40 for struts in tension members<br />

P, = 0.75 when struts may be bottle shaped and crack control reinforcement is included (Fig. 3: (a))<br />

P s = 0.60 when struts may be bottle shaped and crack control reinforcement is not included (Fig. 3: (b))<br />

P t = 0.60 for all other cases (Fig. 3: (c) and (e))<br />

Notes: <strong>The</strong> angle between the struts and adjoining ties has to be greater than 25°<br />

Crack control reinforcement requirement is ^p w sin7, > 0.003, where p w is the steel ratio of the i-th<br />

layer of reinforcement crossing that strut, and y, is the angle between the axis of a strut and the bars.<br />

Nodes: f cu = 0.85(3 J L<br />

where: p, = 1.00 when nodes are bounded by struts and/or bearing areas<br />

P, = 0.80 when nodes anchor only one de<br />

P 5 = 0.60 when nodes anchor more than one tie<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!