24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210<br />

Gaussian) methods are advocated because of their successful application in previous studies (Dyke et<br />

al. 1996). For the controller design, x g is taken to be a stationary white noise, and an infinite horizon<br />

performance index is chosen that weights the modal states by controlled modes such as<br />

J slimier f \w T cQw c + u T Ru)dt] (7)<br />

*-»- r L J ° J<br />

where R is a 2x2 identity matrix because the numerical example has two MR dampers, and Q is a<br />

2Zx2/ diagonal matrix. It should be noted that the size of Q is reduced from 2nx2n to 21x21 because the<br />

limited lower modes are controlled. <strong>The</strong>refore, it can be said that it is more convenient to design the<br />

smaller weighting matrix of modal control. For example, when the lowest one mode is controlled for<br />

calculating the modal control action, Q is a 2x2 diagonal matrix.<br />

Modal State Estimation<br />

An observer for modal state estimation should be provided, since real sensors may not estimate the fu]l<br />

modal states directly or the system may be expensive to prepare the sensors for the full states. To<br />

estimate the modal state vector H>cW from the measured output y (£), we consider a Kalman-Bucy filter<br />

as an observer(Meirovitch, 1990). Not only, in this paper, the state feedback including velocities or<br />

displacements is considered, but also the acceleration feedback is implemented for the modal state<br />

estimation using a Kalman-Buch filter. In any case, we can write a modal observer in the form<br />

$ c (t) = A c w c (t) + B c f(t) + E c x g +L[y(t)~C c w c (t}-D c f(t)] (8)<br />

where w c (t) is the estimated controlled modal state and L is the optimally chosen observer gain matrix<br />

by solving a matrix Riccati equation, which assumes that the noise intensities associated with<br />

earthquake and sensors are known. C c is changeable according to the signals which are used for the<br />

feedback and D c is generally zero except the acceleration feedback. For modal state estimation from<br />

the displacements, C c = [4> C 0 ]. For control with the velocity feedback, C c = [ 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!