24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

investigation and subsequently improve understanding of the underlying physical process. In this<br />

study, we use the HHT to characterize the structural damage from the recordings and model-based<br />

simulated data of controlled field vibration tests of two substructures in Trinity River Relief (TRR)<br />

Bridge in Texas in its intact, minor- and severe-damage stages.<br />

612<br />

HHT ANALYSIS OF DESTRUCTIVE VIBRATION TESTING DATA<br />

<strong>The</strong> bndge for the case study is the Trinity River Relief (TRR) Bridge, located on old US Hwy 90 on<br />

the west side of Liberty, Texas. <strong>The</strong> three stages of the bent shown in Fig. 1 is in order:<br />

(1) Intact stage: the column with sensor 15 was not broken and soil around the pile had the same<br />

height as the soil around the pile with sensor 13.<br />

(2) Minor-damage stage: the pile with sensor 15 was not broken, but soil around the pile was<br />

excavated, which was simulated for flood-induced minor scour with partial loss of load capacity.<br />

(3) Severe-damage stage: the pile with sensor 15 was broken with the steel bars left only and soil<br />

around the pile was excavated, which could be regarded as equivalent damage of the column due to<br />

earthquake-induced liquefaction or severe scour with complete loss of load capacity.<br />

Figs. 2a and 2b show respectively the time histories of vertical excitation force and its corresponding<br />

vertical vibration response at sensor 15 with the structure in intact stage. Both time histories are<br />

highly nonstationary, with the frequency sweeping almost linearly from 4 Hz at 0.3 s to 72 Hz at 5.7 s,<br />

referred to as chirp frequency for later use. <strong>The</strong>refore, their Fourier spectra are unable to provide<br />

faithful time-dependent frequency content of the data.<br />

Fig. 3 a shows that the excitation contains a dominant energy with the chirp frequency increasing with<br />

time from 4 Hz at 0.3 s to 72 Hz at 5.7 s. <strong>The</strong> excitation also has energy at other frequencies such as<br />

high frequencies ranging from 20 to 50 Hz between 0.4 and l.ls shown in Fig. 3a, which can be<br />

visually verified from the excitation time history shown in Fig. 2a.<br />

It is known that the frequency content of the vibration response should contain primarily both the<br />

driving frequencies and the natural frequencies of the structure. This is confirmed by Fig. 3b.<br />

Specifically, Fig. 3b shows the energy with a primary frequency content linearly increasing with time,<br />

which is the signature of excitation with the chirp frequency. By comparing with Fig. 3 a, the signature<br />

of excitation in Fig. 3b can also be found at frequency band of 20-30 Hz between 0.4-0.8 s and of 0-30<br />

Hz between 4.7-5.7 s, among others. In addition to the above excitation-inherited energy, Fig. 3b also<br />

illustrates energy concentration in the frequency range of 10-20 Hz (others in 20-75 Hz) between 1-2 s.<br />

This is not inherent from the excitation in Fig. 3 a but rather the energy contributed from the structural<br />

vibration modes at a couple of lower (higher) natural frequencies, or the signature of the structure.<br />

This, together with the subsequent interpretation, will be verified later by a model-based analysis. <strong>The</strong><br />

aforementioned vibration with 10-20 Hz at 1-2 s is likely excited by the force with a low-frequency<br />

band in 4-15 Hz at 0.4-1 s (see Figs. 2a and 3a,b). As time goes on (say 2-3 s), the vibration at the<br />

low-frequency band dies down quickly due to damping, or is too small to be shown in the figure in<br />

comparison with strong excitation-inherited energy. Since the first mode of vertical vibration motion<br />

should be dominant in the low-frequency band, the above observation and assertion suggests that the<br />

fundamental natural frequency can be found from the Hilbert amplitude spectrum by identifying the<br />

corresponding dominant structural energy, particularly around 1-2 s.<br />

Fig. 4a enlarges the Hilbert amplitude spectrum in Fig. 3b. Except the excitation energy at chirp<br />

frequency and at high-frequency band of 15-30 Hz between 0.5-0.7 s, all the other energy<br />

concentration shown in Fig. 4a is attributed primarily by the structure itself. We now focus on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!