24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

258<br />

separating the above three effects, such variability can be addressed in stages so that ground shaking<br />

prediction becomes easier to generalise.<br />

RSD<br />

(a)<br />

Miaximum Displacement (Drift) Demand RSD m<br />

RSD ^RSV^—^S L<br />

applies to rock spectrum for<br />

moderate-large events.<br />

suggested<br />

T=5secs<br />

Natural Period T^T 2 = TS for soil spectrum<br />

LogRSV<br />

Maximum Velocity (Kinetic Energy) Demand RSV inax<br />

ct<br />

(b)<br />

T,orT s T=5secs Velocity Demand (RSV)<br />

Log Natural Period T<br />

Fig. 1.1: Response spectra and response spectral parameters<br />

2. PATH AND SITE EFFECTS MODELLING<br />

<strong>The</strong> M-dependent source properties a(M) of the CAM model have been dealt with by Lam and<br />

Chandler (2002). <strong>The</strong> attenuation of seismic waves is significantly more regionally dependent than<br />

source properties; thus, it is inappropriate to propose a generalised relationship. Ideally, attenuation is<br />

best modelled by correlating locally recorded strong motion with distance, using a large representative<br />

database. A direct approach is often not achievable, due to the chronic lack of strong-motion data in<br />

regions of low to moderate seismicity such as South China (including Hong Kong). An alternative<br />

viable approach is to estimate the effects of individual wave modification mechanisms based on known<br />

geophysical parameters (which do not require the recording of strong motion for their determination).<br />

<strong>The</strong> combined path effects (which exclude local site modifications, dealt with below) can be expressed<br />

as the product of the following component factors: (i) geometrical attenuation factor G(R,D), (ii)<br />

anelastic attenuation, or energy absorption, factor $R,Q) 9 (iii) the mid-crustal amplification factor<br />

JmcWwee), and (iv) the upper crust modification factor y uc ; where the associated parameters are the<br />

crustal depth (D, in km), the shear wave velocity gradient of the earth's crust and the wave<br />

transmission quality factor (Q). <strong>The</strong> component factors as summarised in Lam and Chandler (2002)<br />

were derived by curve-fitting results from stochastic simulations of regional seismological parameters.<br />

Shaking from distant earthquakes can also induce very significant soil amplification effects, as a result<br />

of the robust transmission of high period energy (in the velocity and displacement-sensitive parts of the<br />

response spectrum) over long distances. <strong>The</strong> 1985 Mexico City and 1989 Loma Prieta, California<br />

earthquakes offer well-known recent examples of this phenomenon. <strong>The</strong> site response component

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!