24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

424<br />

damping ratio provided by the control devices is described<br />

where f a and C are the additional and the original structural damping ratios, respectively, and s is<br />

the diagonal element of the weighing matrix R . <strong>The</strong> instantaneous optimal control force in Eqn. 2.9 is<br />

(2.11)<br />

<strong>The</strong> control force described in Eqn. 2.11 provides more reasonable damping distribution and is more<br />

suitable for semi-active fluid control devices considering semi-active fluid control devices acting<br />

essentially as passive dampers with adjustable parameters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> control force in Eqn. 2.1 1 can further reduce the linear responses of structures to compare with the<br />

linear optimal control force and other type of control force, however, it will be further investigated in<br />

this study that the control force in Eqn. 2.11 can establish further reduction for the nonlinear structures<br />

with hysteretic restoring force in comparison with the linear optimal control strategy and other type of<br />

control strategies. <strong>The</strong> optimal linear control force (LQR or LQG) can be obtained in Eqn. 2.12 with<br />

the positive definite symmetric matrix P determined by the matrix Riccati equation.<br />

= -R' l B T PZ(t) (2.12)<br />

For simplicity, A will be replaced with A^, and<br />

0<br />

where K is the<br />

pre-yielding stiffness matrix. And the weighing matrices Oand R in Eqn. 2.12 and Riccati equation<br />

will be determined by Eqn. 2.7 and the demanding control force, respectively. <strong>The</strong> matrix in Eqn. 2.7<br />

will also be used to determine the instantaneous optimal control force in the Eqn. 2.5 (MM for short) in<br />

order to compare the performance with that established in Eqn.2.11.<br />

3. INSTANTANEOUS OPTIMAL CONTROL WITH OBSERVER<br />

It is impossible to install sensors at all DOFs to measure all responses from the practical application<br />

view. However, it is a realistic way that few sensors are only installed at limit locations to measure<br />

responses and other unobserved responses could be estimated by some filter methods, such as the<br />

Kalman filter and the extended Kalman filter (EKF). <strong>The</strong> Kalman filter is a stochastic filter that allows<br />

the estimation of the states of a system based on a linear state space model and the EKF uses a local<br />

linearisation to extend the scope of the Kalman filter to systems described by nonlinear ordinary<br />

differential equations (Maybeck 1982).<br />

Since the Kalrnan filter is based on linear model that inherently implies the structure to be always in<br />

elastic phase, it is not suitable for the nonlinear structure control problem. Comparing with the Kalman<br />

filter, the EKF is based on nonlinear model, its time varying model parameter can track the stiffness

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!