24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

279<br />

STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS RESULTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> yield point of the structure, defined based on an equivalent elasto-plastic system with reduced<br />

stiffness, evaluated as a secant through 75% of the maximum, is adapted for this study On the other<br />

hand, the ultimate limit state (ULS) is based on a global criterion of the attainment of 3% interstorey<br />

drift. At this level of drift, it is generally accepted that structures would have suffered major structural<br />

and non-structural damage. Further refinement of the limit states is not necessary since the primary<br />

objective is to compare the different structures. Figure 3 shows the force-displacement curve for the<br />

normal strength and the equivalent stiffness structures. It is noticeable that the initial stiffness of the<br />

structures is the same This feature is also exhibited in the reduced stiffness structure, thus validating<br />

the equivalence criteria used. This also confirms that imposing equivalent stiffness at the member level<br />

will give a structure with the same overall stiffness.<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

* 6000 -<br />

W<br />

u<br />

K<br />

4000<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/•<br />

^ -~ ~<br />

>- — 1<br />

500 1000 1500<br />

TOP DISPLACEMENT(mm)<br />

N35 1-<br />

---- NSO I<br />

Kttnn ,<br />

2000<br />

FIGURE 3<br />

FORCE-DISPLACEMENT CURVE FOR N35, N80, N100 AND N120<br />

<strong>The</strong> level of overstrength is defined herein as the ratio of the capacity of the structure, based on the<br />

static pushover analysis, to the code-defined design base shear. <strong>The</strong> calculated overstrength for the<br />

different structures is given in Table 5.<br />

TABLES<br />

STRUCTURE OVERSTRENGTH<br />

Model<br />

Overstrength<br />

N35<br />

6.29<br />

N80<br />

4.51<br />

N100<br />

4.47<br />

N120<br />

4.42<br />

N80R<br />

4.20<br />

NIOOR<br />

4.67<br />

N120R<br />

4.93<br />

N80RS<br />

4.25<br />

N100RS<br />

4.77<br />

N120RS<br />

5 10<br />

For each of the ten structures, dynamic analysis was performed with three artificial records, scaled to<br />

the design ground acceleration (PGA) and twice the design PGA, corresponding to 0.4g and 0.8g,<br />

respectively. As a measure of global response characteristics, the displacement and total base shear<br />

time-history and the interstorey drift ratio from the analyses are examined. For the purposes of<br />

discussion, NSO, N100 and N120 constitute "E" group (based on the equivalent stiffness criterion);<br />

N80R, NIOOR and N120R constitute "R" group (based on the reduced stiffness criterion); and N80RS,<br />

N100RS and N120RS constitute"RS" group (based on the reduced stiffness criterion with one steel<br />

grade only).<br />

It was observed that for buildings in the same group, subjected to the same input motion, the shape of<br />

the displacement and base shear response was similar. This suggests that structures in the same group

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!