24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 471<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MULTISTOREY MASONRY<br />

BUILDING WITH RESTRICTED BASE SLIDING<br />

M. Qamaruddin, S. Ahmad, H. Irtaza and S. M. Waseem<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Z. H. College of <strong>Engineering</strong> and Technology,<br />

Aligarh Muslim <strong>University</strong>, Aligarh 202002, India<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In the present investigation, a multistory masonry building system is considered in which a<br />

smoothened surface is created at the top of the substructure and the superstructure rests at this level<br />

and restricted sliding is permitted with fnctional resistance. <strong>The</strong> restricted sliding base system is<br />

idealized as a discrete mass mathematical model with two degree of freedom for computing its seismic<br />

response. <strong>The</strong> shear walls provide the spring action in the system. <strong>The</strong> total mass of the superstructure<br />

of the building, that is, the mass of all the stones, except the bottom half of the ground story mass, is<br />

lumped as top mass in the model and mass of the remaining bottom half portion of the ground story is<br />

lumped as bottom mass in the model. <strong>The</strong> bottom mass is assumed to rest on a plane with dry frictional<br />

damping to permit restricted sliding of the system. <strong>The</strong> seismic response of multistory masonry<br />

building with restricted sliding subjected to Koyna and El Centro earthquakes is computed employing<br />

this mathematical model treating the frictional resistance as rigid plastic. It turns out from this study<br />

that the restricted sliding base system is effective in reducing the seismic force acting on the building<br />

with low values of coefficient of friction. <strong>The</strong> seismic response of such a system is much reduced<br />

compared to the fixed base buildings with the same parameters.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

In past earthquake in India, unengineered masonry buildings were mostly damaged<br />

due to a variety of factors, such as. their short fundamental period and mostly lying in the dominant<br />

frequency range of strong earthquakes; very low tensile and moderate shear strength; some times not<br />

sufficiently high compressive strength; usually poor workmanship, etc. To improve the behavior of<br />

masonry structures under seismic forces, strengthening measures have been proposed. In spite of all<br />

these measures, masonry buildings can still be cracked during the earthquake. Such damage might be<br />

avoided if major part of the seismic energy is dissipated during earthquake One possibility to achieve<br />

this objective is by means of base isolation technique, which consists of decoupling the structures from<br />

the damaging effect of the earthquake. In the last few decades, various researchers have proposed<br />

varieties of isolation devices.<br />

In several major earthquake occurrences in developing countries like India and China, a beneficial<br />

behavior of the low-rise buildings which could slide as rigid bodies over their foundations was<br />

observed during some past severe earthquakes, viz., the Dhubri <strong>Earthquake</strong> in Assam in 1930 [2], and<br />

in Bihar-Nepal <strong>Earthquake</strong> in 1934. <strong>The</strong> damage study by Gee [2] and the observations made in China<br />

by LiLi [3], showed that those buildings in which the possibility of movement existed between the<br />

superstructure and the substructure suffered less damage than those buildings in which no such<br />

freedom of movements existed. Arya, Chandra and Qamaruddin [1], LiLi [3] and Qamaruddin [5] have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!