07.05.2015 Views

Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver

Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver

Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pulacayo</strong> 1 000 t/d Phase I <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - NI 43-101 Technical Report<br />

090644-3-0000-20-IFI-100<br />

Sulphide NSR Underground Cut-Off Calculation USD<br />

Process Cost (1000 tpd) 12.00 USD/ton processed<br />

General and Administration 2.50 USD/ton processed<br />

Extra out of Mine Haulage 1.00 USD/ton processed<br />

Underground Mining 42.50 USD/ton mined<br />

Selling costs & payables 12 USD/ton processed ($240/tonne concentrate<br />

x 5% mass pull)<br />

Operating costs per ore ton (12.00 USD +2.50 USD +1.00 USD+ 42.50 USD<br />

+ 12.00USD) = 70.00 USD/ton processed<br />

The third criterion was based on practical mining widths. The shrinkage stopes widths are<br />

between 0.8m and 1.5m. The long-hole open stopes are between 3.0 and 6.0 meters wide.<br />

The forth criterion for stope generation was that the ore within the stopes on each level must<br />

pay for the development to reach and exploit that level. Due to there being less Indicated<br />

Resource below level 147, the stopes that qualified under the previous three criteria were<br />

minimal. These stopes were not able to carry the costs of development below level 147 and<br />

were removed from the design.<br />

Recovery curves have been generated to determine the recoverable metal content of the<br />

blocks. These curves are based on locked cycle floatation tests (LCTs) completed by<br />

Maelgwyn Minerals Services Africa. Metal prices used were US$28/oz for silver, US$0.86/lb<br />

for lead and US$1.00/lb for zinc. Average payables on lead zinc and silver were estimated at<br />

US$240/t concentrate.<br />

15.4 Modifying Factors<br />

The selected mining method will require backfilling of stopes and no pillars will be left behind.<br />

Based on this, the mining recovery was estimated to be 91%.<br />

Mining Loss: 2%<br />

Loss due to lashing: 2%<br />

Loss due to existing voids: 5%<br />

Mining dilution is estimated to be 8%. It is anticipated that 8% of the material mined will be<br />

unplanned waste from blasting overbreak and possible contamination from the existing<br />

stopes.<br />

15.5 Mineral Reserves<br />

The <strong>Pulacayo</strong> Mineral Reserves are estimated in Table 15.1 below.<br />

Table 15.1: Mineral Reserve Statement prepared by TWP – Effective Date 17 January 2013<br />

Class<br />

Million<br />

Tons (Mt)<br />

AG<br />

(G/T)<br />

PB<br />

(%)<br />

ZN<br />

(%)<br />

AG<br />

(MOz)<br />

Probable 3.558 239.4 1.09 1.91 27.385 38,927 67,905<br />

PB<br />

(T)<br />

ZN<br />

(T)<br />

TWP Sudamérica S.A. Av. Encalada 1257 Of. 801, Santiago de Surco Lima 33, Perú (51-1) 4377473<br />

Page 143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!