Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver
Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver
Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Pulacayo</strong> 1 000 t/d Phase I <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - NI 43-101 Technical Report<br />
090644-3-0000-20-IFI-100<br />
agreements, very few terms are left undefined, with typically only the treatment charges,<br />
escalators/de-escalators and refining charges, as applicable, and any Quotational Periods<br />
subject to annual adjustment. Other terms, such as metal accountabilities and payment terms are<br />
typically fixed for the life of the contract.<br />
The annual TC/RC adjustment to be agreed under such long-term agreements is typically<br />
referenced off market benchmarks. As the zinc concentrate market tends to be relatively<br />
transparent with information regarding settlements readily available via market sources<br />
(merchants, press reports, industry analysts such as Brook Hunt or CRU, etc.), it has traditionally<br />
been fairly easy to establish the applicable annual benchmarks. Although these sources can also<br />
be used for establishing reference lead TC/RCs, as discussed above, the market for lead<br />
concentrates has become somewhat more opaque over the past few years so careful<br />
consideration should go into which references are chosen and how such references might apply<br />
under evolving market conditions.<br />
There is no consistent market structure for the duration of the TC/RCs agreed – they can be set<br />
according to various formats. For example, TC/RCs can be negotiated annually to cover 100% of<br />
the contractual year’s deliveries. Alternatively, terms can be fixed for two or three year periods (or<br />
longer).<br />
For annually negotiated agreements, and particularly where the agreement is tied to project<br />
financing, clear definitions as to how terms are to be determined must be set out in the contract.<br />
Under such agreements, failure by the parties to agree in any given year will subject the parties<br />
to a referee mechanism whereby an independent third-party referee (or referees) will determine<br />
the appropriate treatment and refining charges to apply to a given year’s contractual deliveries.<br />
Where there is no such referee mechanism, failure by the parties to agree terms in any given<br />
year will typically lead to a “holiday” i.e. the tonnage contracted for that year’s (or those years)<br />
deliveries will be cancelled.<br />
Medium-Term (2-5 Year) Contracts<br />
Essentially, TC/RCs under medium-term contracts can be established using TC/RC conventions<br />
as per the long-term agreements. However, it is uncommon to have a referee mechanism<br />
available for failure to agree on annually negotiated terms, such that failure to agree will lead to a<br />
contract holiday which will result in cancellation of that year’s (or those years) deliveries.<br />
Short Term/Spot Contracts<br />
Shorter term or spot contracts are usually negotiated basis prevailing spot market conditions. All<br />
contractual terms (TC, RCs, escalators/de-escalators, if any, Quotational Period, payment terms,<br />
etc.) are up for negotiation in such contracts. While many of these contracts are entered into with<br />
merchants or brokers, it is not entirely uncommon for a mine to deal direct with a smelter. Shortterm/spot<br />
contracts can be for single or multiple shipments but would typically be defined as<br />
deliveries, which are to occur within no more than a year of the agreement date.<br />
For purposes of the <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong>, it is recommended that the following charges be used:<br />
TWP Sudamérica S.A. Av. Encalada 1257 Of. 801, Santiago de Surco Lima 33, Perú (51-1) 4377473<br />
Page 230