Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver
Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver
Pulacayo Project Feasibility Study - Apogee Silver
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Pulacayo</strong> 1 000 t/d Phase I <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - NI 43-101 Technical Report<br />
090644-3-0000-20-IFI-100<br />
(7) Preliminary Economic Assessment<br />
A Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) dated 25 June 2010 was completed by Micon<br />
for <strong>Apogee</strong> and reported by Pressacco et al. (2010). The assessment forms part of <strong>Apogee</strong>’s<br />
continuous public disclosure record and is available on SEDAR. However, as disclosed in<br />
the revised Mercator resource estimate Technical Report dated 09 May 2012 (Cullen and<br />
Webster, 2012a) the conclusions and analysis presented in the Micon PEA were no longer<br />
considered to be current with respect to the <strong>Pulacayo</strong> project. This reflected <strong>Apogee</strong>’s<br />
initiation of current project <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> programs that include changes in project scope<br />
and approach. Since <strong>Apogee</strong> no longer considers the Micon 2010 PA to be current, details<br />
of that analysis are not presented in this report and were not used to support the 09 May<br />
2012 revised resource estimate by Mercator.<br />
9.2.7 Mineral Resource Estimates by Mercator<br />
Mercator prepared a mineral resource estimate for the <strong>Pulacayo</strong> deposit in 2011 after<br />
completion of additional diamond drilling on the property. Table 9.3 presents details of this<br />
estimate, which has an effective date of 19 October 2011. The current estimate supersedes<br />
this resource statement, which is now considered historic and should not be relied upon.<br />
Table 9.3: Historic <strong>Pulacayo</strong> Deposit Mineral Resource – 19 October 2011<br />
Class Rounded Tons Ag g/t Pb % Zn %<br />
Inferred 5,420, 000 150.61 0.83 2.07<br />
Indicated 5,960,000 153.14 0.91 2.04<br />
(1) Mineral Resources are reported above a $ 40 USD NSR cut-off<br />
(2) Metal prices used were $ 24.78 USD/oz Ag, $ 1.19 USD/lb Pb, and $ 1.09 USD/’b<br />
Zn<br />
(3) Tonnages have been rounded to the nearest 10,000<br />
(4) Contributing 1 m composites were capped at 1,500 g/t Ag, 15% Pb, and 15% Zn<br />
(5) Specific gravity is based on an interpolated ID2 model<br />
(6) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated<br />
economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by<br />
environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other<br />
relevant issues.<br />
The 19 October 2011 Mercator estimate was based on validated results of 59,352 m of<br />
diamond drilling from 174 surface drill holes and 41 underground drill holes carried out by<br />
ASC Bolivia and <strong>Apogee</strong> through various drill programs between 2002 and 2011. Modeling<br />
was performed using Gemcom Surpac(R) 6.2.1 modeling software with silver, lead and zinc<br />
grades estimated by inverse distance squared (ID2) interpolation from 1 m down hole assay<br />
TWP Sudamérica S.A. Av. Encalada 1257 Of. 801, Santiago de Surco Lima 33, Perú (51-1) 4377473<br />
Page 52