specific needs of children and elderly left behind as a ... - IOM Moldova
specific needs of children and elderly left behind as a ... - IOM Moldova
specific needs of children and elderly left behind as a ... - IOM Moldova
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The perception <strong>of</strong> labour migration<br />
helped them to accept their parents migration. Even if their opinion w<strong>as</strong><br />
not <strong>as</strong>ked, <strong>children</strong> justify their parents’ decision, saying: “...you have to<br />
agree with your parents decision, they are elder, they know what they’re doing”<br />
(III_C_16). Or, the acceptance <strong>of</strong> migration is supported by the certainty<br />
that this step is taken in order to ensure the <strong>children</strong>’s well-being,<br />
this being inevitable in certain c<strong>as</strong>es.<br />
There is a certain interdependence between a child’s age <strong>and</strong> the extent to<br />
which he/she accepts the situation, thus the elder the child is the e<strong>as</strong>ier it<br />
is for him/her to accept the situation <strong>of</strong> their parents having to migrate <strong>and</strong><br />
vice versa: “I am big <strong>and</strong> I underst<strong>and</strong> that they are not leaving for their own<br />
sake but for our future... I do underst<strong>and</strong> this, but my little sister... doesn’t…”<br />
(III_C_ 21). At the same time, the survey highlighted some c<strong>as</strong>es when<br />
migration w<strong>as</strong> accepted at first, but opposed afterwards, especially due<br />
to family problems: “At first I understood that she had to leave but right now<br />
I just cannot accept that she is staying there, I don’t think this is right... It is<br />
so hard for all <strong>of</strong> us” (III_C_19). In some c<strong>as</strong>es, <strong>children</strong> accept migration<br />
but are eagerly waiting for the moment <strong>of</strong> their parents’ return home. In<br />
other c<strong>as</strong>es, <strong>children</strong> expressed not only their acceptance <strong>of</strong> migration but<br />
also their content at the situation, explaining this feeling due to a decre<strong>as</strong>e<br />
<strong>of</strong> parental control: “When my mom <strong>left</strong> I w<strong>as</strong> happy. Nobody w<strong>as</strong> telling<br />
me what to do anymore, how to arrange my hair. I w<strong>as</strong> given more freedom”<br />
(III_C_25). Thus, we encountered situations <strong>of</strong> an erroneous perception <strong>of</strong><br />
liberty: “...we have to accept that there are <strong>children</strong> who are not happy when<br />
their parents come back home. I met a girl who said: my mom is coming back<br />
next week <strong>and</strong>... She will start bothering me again” (FG_C_ 3_rural). The<br />
pertinence <strong>of</strong> such feelings contains a high risk <strong>of</strong> intergenerational relations<br />
that will persist in the future <strong>and</strong> at the society level, it can manifest<br />
<strong>as</strong> a dysfunction within the family.<br />
During focus-group discussions, <strong>children</strong> whose parents did not leave expressed<br />
their regret concerning the fact that some <strong>children</strong> – whose parents<br />
are abroad – adopt a deviant behaviour (skipping school, lying, smoking,<br />
drinking, etc). Meanwhile, <strong>children</strong> whose parents didn’t leave explain<br />
this by saying “this is their way <strong>of</strong> finding consolation” (FG_C_2_rural). In<br />
most c<strong>as</strong>es, such behaviour w<strong>as</strong> indirectly indicated, when the interviewed<br />
persons were talking about <strong>children</strong> in their communities.<br />
An important <strong>as</strong>pect <strong>of</strong> accepting/rejecting parents leaving abroad constitutes<br />
the personality <strong>of</strong> the guardian (legal or otherwise) who takes care <strong>of</strong><br />
the child. The survey listed among them family members (the other parent,<br />
for instance), gr<strong>and</strong>parents, aunts, other relatives, friends <strong>and</strong> even<br />
neighbours. An interesting reality w<strong>as</strong> confirmed: the child’s acceptance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the caregiver does not depend directly on the degree <strong>of</strong> kinship they<br />
have. On the contrary, there were c<strong>as</strong>es when the child lived with one <strong>of</strong><br />
23