10.07.2015 Views

An investigation into the phenomena and practices of spiritual ...

An investigation into the phenomena and practices of spiritual ...

An investigation into the phenomena and practices of spiritual ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

stages <strong>of</strong> analysis can in fact be accommodated within <strong>the</strong> three stages used in <strong>the</strong> NVivos<strong>of</strong>tware package (c.f. Brewer 2000: 42). Stage One selects utterances in <strong>the</strong> data. NVivoallocates <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> attributes or nodes where a term is selected <strong>and</strong> NVivo identifies <strong>the</strong>number <strong>of</strong> times this word or group <strong>of</strong> words appear in <strong>the</strong> data (interviews, observations,notes). Stage Two develops <strong>the</strong> attributes according to <strong>the</strong> evidence in <strong>the</strong> data or <strong>the</strong>context in which <strong>the</strong>y are used in <strong>the</strong> data. The third stage examines <strong>the</strong> interconnectionbetween <strong>the</strong> attributes <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature. Stage Four subjected <strong>the</strong> observations generatedfrom <strong>the</strong> previous stages to fur<strong>the</strong>r scrutiny <strong>and</strong> Stage Five, <strong>the</strong> final stage, selects patterns<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes as <strong>the</strong>y appear in several interviews <strong>and</strong> subjects <strong>the</strong>m to ano<strong>the</strong>r level <strong>of</strong>analysis. The coding <strong>and</strong> analysis process removes <strong>the</strong> researcher from auto-ethnographicmethodology, although <strong>the</strong> critical reflective approach as an academic convention is usedto develop <strong>the</strong> end product <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis.In <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> findings using McCracn‟s (1988) model, <strong>the</strong> investigator is aninstrument <strong>of</strong> <strong>investigation</strong>. He is <strong>the</strong> deliberately dispassionate operator <strong>of</strong> a piece <strong>of</strong>calibrated methodological machinery <strong>and</strong> finally takes a back stage in <strong>the</strong> culture inquestion. The investigator allows <strong>the</strong> audience to take a glimpse <strong>of</strong> assumptions <strong>and</strong>categories that are o<strong>the</strong>rwise hidden from view. The categories tells us what people think<strong>and</strong> do, not how many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m think <strong>and</strong> do. In this research <strong>the</strong> investigator makesobservations <strong>the</strong>n make a second <strong>and</strong> third level observation by interpreting <strong>the</strong> data from<strong>the</strong> initial interviews <strong>and</strong> observations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are presented at different levels <strong>of</strong>analysis. Extracting important elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data that relates to healing activitiesespecially in <strong>the</strong> church services <strong>of</strong> COGIC was particularly difficult. Returning to <strong>the</strong>writings <strong>of</strong> Hammersley <strong>and</strong> Atkinson (2007) <strong>and</strong> McCracken (1988) illuminated <strong>the</strong>91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!