10.07.2015 Views

An investigation into the phenomena and practices of spiritual ...

An investigation into the phenomena and practices of spiritual ...

An investigation into the phenomena and practices of spiritual ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

does not make <strong>the</strong> position equitable as more <strong>of</strong>ten than not it is <strong>the</strong> interviewer who has amore informed underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> both positions. King (2002) <strong>and</strong> Oakley (1995) bothadvocate that <strong>the</strong> interviewer should take an open <strong>and</strong> personal responsiveness in <strong>the</strong>irapproach to <strong>the</strong> interview <strong>and</strong> King (2002) believes that „being yourself‟ puts <strong>the</strong>interviewer in good stead when things do not go as planned for ei<strong>the</strong>r party. It is notpossible for <strong>the</strong>re to be a truly equitable relationship, however much effort is put <strong>into</strong>reassuring <strong>the</strong> respondent that <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> right to withdraw at any point in <strong>the</strong> process.For many people once <strong>the</strong>y have made a commitment to do something with ano<strong>the</strong>r person<strong>the</strong>y feel obliged to carry out <strong>the</strong> commitment <strong>and</strong> not to fail to fulfil such a commitmentoverride any discomfort or any wish to withdraw from <strong>the</strong> procedure, especially if <strong>the</strong>re isno obvious short term or long term harm .The researcher comes to <strong>the</strong> relationship with anobjective <strong>and</strong> sometimes <strong>the</strong> need to fulfil <strong>the</strong> objective overrides any discomfort that <strong>the</strong>respondent may experience. Having said this; <strong>the</strong> contribution to <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> hum<strong>and</strong>evelopment through research <strong>and</strong> providing additional knowledge is usually <strong>the</strong> maindriving force for <strong>the</strong> research as well for <strong>the</strong> respondent. In this sense <strong>the</strong> relationship is anequitable one.Some equity was afforded by giving <strong>the</strong> respondents <strong>the</strong> option to withdraw from <strong>the</strong> studyat any time during <strong>the</strong> interview or <strong>the</strong> transcript phase. The position was not completelyequitable; however, as <strong>the</strong> power relationship could not be reconciled. From <strong>the</strong>respondent‟s point <strong>of</strong> view, <strong>the</strong> researcher isledgeable about research; she is anacademic with extensive knowledge <strong>of</strong> nursing <strong>and</strong> medicine <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents,especially those from <strong>the</strong> Pentecostal church, were asked by <strong>the</strong> Pastor to co-operate with<strong>the</strong> researcher. It is unlikely that <strong>the</strong>y felt like <strong>the</strong>y were equal although <strong>the</strong>y signed <strong>the</strong>consent form for <strong>the</strong> interview. No one volunteered by choice. All <strong>the</strong> „volunteers‟ were87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!